Join our webinar on July 24-25 for an in-depth analysis of Union Budget 2024. Learn about tax proposals, sector impacts, and investment insights. Register now!
Join CA Sachin Jain for a live course on Input Tax Credit from a litigation perspective. Gain practical insights and master ITC complexities. Register now!
In exercise of powers conferred by sub-section (5) read with sub-section (1) of section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) and read with rules 18, 20 and 22 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995, the Central Government hereby rescinds the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No.98/2003-Customs, dated the 1st July, 2003.
whereas on the basis of aforesaid recommendation of the designated authority, the Central Government has ordered, vide notification No. 98/2003-Customs, dated the 1st July, 2003, published in Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) of the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, dated the 1st July, 2003.
In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (a) of section 7 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Board of Excise and Customs hereby makes the following further amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No. 61/94-Customs (N.T.), dated the 21st November, 1994.
Attention is invited to Public Notice No 71 dated 12.07.2004 wherein the suspension of DEPB rates of notified products in the Engineering Product Group made vide Public Notice No 54 dated 28.02.2004 and amended by Public Notice No 56 dated 10.03.2004 was revoked.
Considering the developments in the securities market in India and abroad and also keeping in view the interests of investors, SEBI had desired to revisit the KIM.
The undersigned is directed to state that subsequent to Budget 2004 announcements, a number of representations/ references have been received from the trade as well as from the field formations pertaining to the changes made in the excise duty structure on Textiles and Textile Articles. The point raised
