Join our free webinar on July 4th at 4:00 PM to gain insights into the dematerialization of securities and recent amendments. Register now for key updates.
Join our free webinar on July 7 at 5 PM for insights into 10 recent High Court income tax judgments favoring assessees. Expert analysis by CA Dipak Dama.
It is clarified that announcements regarding dividend/rights/bonus etc., can be made outside the market hours i.e if such announcements are to be made before the opening of the market hours it shall be made at least half an hour before the market opens.
In exerciser of the powers conferred by the sub-section (2) of section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) read with rule 13 and rule 20 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995, the Central Government hereby rescinds die notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 115/99-Customs, dated the 11th October,1999.
Therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (5) of section 9A of the said Customs Tariff Act, read with rule 18 and rule 20 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995.
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) read with rule 13 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Antidumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995, the Central Government hereby rescinds the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No.120/99-Customs, dated the 2nd November, 1999, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i) vide G.S.R. 743 (E), dated the 2nd November, 1999.
Therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (5) of section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), read with rules 18 and 20 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995.
Circular No. 524/20/2000-CX Please refer to your letter C.No. IV/16/303/99-CZO dated 7.1.2000 on the above subject and Board’s instructions issued vide F.No., 390/24/99-JC dated 30.3.99. Vide your letter you have drawn attention of the Board to the fact that Commissioner (A), Chennai after considering representations have issued orders asking the appellants to pre-deposit certain amount of duty without grant of personal hearing (reying on the Supreme Court’s decision in CA No. 3597 of 1995 dated 25.3.96 in the case of Union of India vs M/s Jesus Sales Corporation,
Circular No. 523/19/2000-CX It is directed to refer to the Hon’ble Supreme Court Order dated 4.2.2000 (Civil Appeal No.921 of 1992) in the case of UOI and others Vs.Solar Pesticide Pvt. Ltd. Reported in 2000 (116) ELT 401 (SC). The issue of applicability of unjust enrichment provision before granting refund under Section 27 of the Customs Act,1962 was decided by the Ho’ble Bombay High Court in the case of M/s Solar Pesticides Pvt.
