ITAT Delhi ruled that the Assessing Officer cannot alter the share valuation method chosen by the assessee under Rule 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Rules. Consequently, the revenue’s appeal was dismissed.
ITAT Mumbai held that reopening of assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act is invalid if based on no new tangible material. The order clarified that such reopening is legally unsustainable and liable to be quashed.
ITAT Jabalpur held that additions for unexplained investment in agricultural land cannot be made without proper inquiry into the co-owner’s source of funds. The case has been restored for de novo consideration.
Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition, directing taxpayers to approach the appellate authority as an alternate remedy in cases of fraudulent availment of Input Tax Credit, emphasizing proper legal recourse.
ITAT Mumbai ruled that the PCIT rightly invoked revisional powers under Section 263 as the assessment order showed lack of proper inquiry, upholding the revision.
Gujarat High Court ruled that reassessment under Section 148 issued after the permissible time period is invalid, quashing the notice and allowing the writ petition.
Delhi High Court ruled that the Supreme Court’s suo motu Covid orders extending limitation periods apply to PMLA cases, as the Act contains no express exclusion.
Gujarat High Court held that reversing the order sanctioning refund not justified since evidences placed on records are not considered and further petitioner has duly complied with provisions of rule 89(2)(c) of the GST Rules. Accordingly, petition is allowed and order is quashed.
ITAT Agra held that amount deposited during demonetization period cannot be treated as unexplained income since the amount is deposited out of genuine cash sales. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
HC held that large cash payments exceeding Rs.20,000 may be exempt if properly substantiated under Rule 6DD and business needs; Tribunal’s earlier disallowance set aside.
