Madras High Court held that deduction under section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act not eligible in absence of any demonstrable evidence regarding any expense incurred towards eligible project to substantiate development of eligible project.
ITAT Mumbai held that capital gains cannot be treated as unaccounted income under section 68 of the Income Tax Act since AO nowhere proved that assessee himself was involved in price rigging of any of the scrips. Accordingly, appeal of assessee stands allowed.
NCLT Jaipur held that application under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code [IBC] for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process [CIRP] of ACCIL Corporation Pvt. Ltd. [Corporate Debtor] admitted as debt and default stands duly established.
NCLT Mumbai held that application for liquidation of Corporate Debtor [Multicity Hospitals LLP] in terms of section 33(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code [IBC] is allowed as decided by members of CoC.
CESTAT Kolkata held that silk fabric with 85% or more silk excluding Noil Silk is classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading 5007 2090 and cannot be classified as Noil Silk Fabric under Customs Tariff Heading 5007 1000. Accordingly, re-classification of goods not sustainable.
NCLT Mumbai held that Corporate Debtor Unitech Transformers Pvt. Ltd. is ordered to be liquidated in terms of provision of section 33(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code as approved by members of CoC with 83.32% voting share.
Limitation under Rule 68B of the second schedule to the Income Tax Act did not apply to RDDB Act (Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993) proceedings as Rule 68B of the IT Act had no mandatory application to recoveries under the RDDB Act
Form 3CL was not a determinative document for claiming deduction, and non-production of the same did not amount to wilful non-disclosure or suppression of material facts under Explanation 1 to Section 147.
Bombay HC stayed DGFT’s notification changing tariff heading of roasted areca nuts, holding that only Central Government can amend customs classifications under Section 11A.
The Guwahati HC granted anticipatory bail to a man accused in a Rs. 199.31 Cr fake ITC conspiracy, ruling that custodial interrogation was unnecessary as the main accused was already out on default bail.
