ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition towards unexplained cash deposits not justified as CIT(A) has partly accepted the cash book and partly rejected the cash book without assigning any reason. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
ITAT Chennai sets aside ex-parte CIT(A) order on ₹33 lakh cash deposit, citing natural justice and Section 250(6) violations. Case remanded for fresh adjudication.
ITAT Chennai set aside the order and appeal restored back to the file of AO for denovo assessment, however, cost of Rs. 5,000 imposed for non-response on the part of the assessee. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
ITAT Kolkata deletes ₹8.27 lakh addition under Section 69A, ruling cash deposits belonged to Seva Kendra, not the assessee. Penalty also set aside.
Guwahati HC examines violations in Section 148A orders for income tax assessments, directing re-evaluation due to procedural lapses.
Tripura HC remands the case of excise duty levy to the Commissioner for re-examination of supplier records and payment verification.
Present appeals filed by assessee before CIT (A) against the order passed u/s 143 (1). It is the case of the assessee had been allotted two PANs since AY 2002-03 and the assessee filed income tax return under one PAN No. and Second PAN was inactive
ITAT Pune remands the case of Prakash Dipchand Kapadnis, instructing NFAC to reconsider the addition of gross receipts instead of net income for AY 2013-14.
NCLAT Chennai quashes NCLT’s order and grants Dunzo Digital Pvt. Ltd. a final chance to file objections to proceedings under Section 9 of the I&B Code.
ITAT Allahabad remands ₹45.4 lakh unexplained cash deposit case, citing lack of evidence and claims of fraud. Assessee given a fresh chance to present facts.
