In the matter abovementioned ITAT upheld the jurisdiction u/s 263 exercised by PCIT, is right as twin condition of section 263 are fulfilled.
Held that these two petitions are also remanded back to the Competition Commission of India for determination/ decision in accordance with the decision of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court rendered on 29.01.2024 in the aforesaid case.
Bombay High Court held that Explanation 1 and 4 below section 17(2) of the Income Tax Act by the Finance Act, 2007 cannot be declared ultra-vires, irrational or unconstitutional. Said amendments are constitutionally valid.
MP High Court revokes GST cancellation due to personal adversities and directs filing of pending returns with a penalty of ₹50,000.
Uttarakhand HC stays operation of GST Notification No. 56/2023 extending timelines for adjudication, citing issues with lack of GST Council recommendation.
Section 129 could not, merely by virtue of its non-obstante clause, be construed to have an overriding effect on Section 126 which interdicts tax officers from imposing any penalty for minor breaches of tax regulations or procedural requirements.
ITAT Mumbai sets aside CIT(E)’s rejection of a trust’s 12A and 80G registration applications due to incomplete documents, restoring the case for reconsideration.
Tribunal ruled that the deduction was valid under Section 43B, as the payments were made in the relevant assessment year after the disputes were settled through the amnesty schemes.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that entire assessments has been restored to the file of CIT(A) for de novo consideration since assessee was found to be absolutely non-cooperative and took every step to thwart/stonewall the assessment proceedings.
ITAT Ahmedabad affirms CIT(A)’s deletion of ₹12.92 crore tax addition under Section 40A(3), relying on past gross profit rates and valid agricultural purchases.
