This question pertains to formulae for calculation of refund and hence does not fall within the purview of Section 97 of the CGST Act and is therefore not answered.
In re JSL India Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Haryana) Q1. What would be the rate of tax applicable on inter-state supply of parts of railways in unassembled condition? Ans: From the explanatory note VII mentioned above, it is clear that complete or finished articles presented unassembled or disassembled are to be classified in the same […]
In re Sanofi India Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) Whether input tax credit is available of the GST paid on expenses incurred towards promotional schemes of Shubh Labh Loyalty Program? if we accept the contention of the applicant that the promotional items are supplied as a contractual obligation e.g. watch is given under the contractual obligation […]
In re Vijai Electricals Limited (GST AAAR Andhra Pradesh) Ruling of AAR is upheld. Confirmed that the work contracts service rendered by M/s Vijai Electricals (the appellant) to APEPDCL are not eligible for concessional rate of tax 12% as per serial no.3 of entry no.vi (a) of notification no. 24/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 21-09-2017. […]
Peerless General Finance & Investment Co. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) Conclusion: Amount paid as compensation by assessee to related company in respect of vacation of property occupied by that company was made after much negotiation and it was thus in accordance with business of assessee and therefore, the same was allowable. Held: During the […]
Provisions of section 56(2)(vii) have application to ‘property’ which is in nature of a capital asset of recipient and, thus, when assessee purchased a piece of land as stock-in-trade, the addition made by AO in respect of the purchase of land by invoking provisions of section 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii), was to be set aside.
The so-called bank guarantee commission was not in the nature of commission paid to an agent but it was in the nature of bank charges for providing one of the banking services. The requirement of section 194H of the Act, therefore, would not arise.
In re Kayden Investments Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Haryana) In order to decide the admissibility of the application, the applicant was called upon to appear before this Authority on 12.04.2019 vide memo no. 664 dated 09.04.2019, but none appeared on behalf of the applicant. Thereafter, notice of appearance was sent for 22.04.2019 vide memo no. […]
Shri Akashdeep Vs Manpreet Estates LLP (Appellate Tribunal For PBPT Act) It is correct that after amendment in Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 (PBPT Act) , the onus of proving a benami transaction rests entirely on the shoulders of the respondents. Before amendment, the burden of proof was on the prosecution to prove […]
Accordingly, it is believed that under the GST Law, the intent or objective of any club or association is immaterial in so far as the leviability of GST is concerned. Therefore, provision by club, association, society, or any such body (for a subscription or any other consideration) of the facilities or benefits to its members will surely attract GST irrespective of the fact that such club is not set up with the objective of providing any goods or service to its members.
