Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Kayden Investments Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Haryana)
Appeal Number : Advance Ruling No. HAR/HAAR/R/2018-19/53
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/04/2019
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re Kayden Investments Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Haryana)

In order to decide the admissibility of the application, the applicant was called upon to appear before this Authority on 12.04.2019 vide memo no. 664 dated 09.04.2019, but none appeared on behalf of the applicant. Thereafter, notice of appearance was sent for 22.04.2019 vide memo no. 676 dated 16.04.2019. The applicant failed to appear on the 22.04.2019 said date also.

Since, the Authority for Advance Ruling is bound to pronounce ruling within 90 days of the receipt of application as per Section 98(6) of the CGST/HGST Act. The applicant cannot be granted any further opportunity of hearing. Hence, the application of Advance Ruling is rejected under Section 98(2) of the CGST/HGST Act.

FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, HARYANA

1. Statement of relevant facts having a bearing on the question raised:

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031