Mr Satyakam informs the Court that Mr Rajesh Prasad has undertaken a complete review of the procedure and in view of what has transpired in the Court, he undertakes to disband the RAC. He proposes to issue appropriate notification to authorize a proper officer in respect of the refunds above the certain value strictly in accordance with the provisions of the Delhi GST Act. He undertakes to place before the Court on the next date, by way of an affidavit, the steps taken by him in this regard.
Revenue share based licence fee held to be allowable expense under section 37(1), merely because the Revenue has not accepted the decision of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court and an SLP has been filed against the said order, the same cannot be a ground to disallow the expenditure unless and until the same is reversed or stayed by the Supreme Court
Hari Sankaran Vs Union of India & amp (Supreme Court of India) Civil Appeal No. 3747 of 2019 titled Hari Sankaran vs. Union of India & Others filed by Ex-Director of Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services Limited before the Apex Court has been dismissed by the Hon’ble Court. The Civil Appeal No.3747/2019 was filed by […]
Deputy Commissioner for Stamps (DC) erroneously directed assessee to pay stamp duty under Article 28(a) of the Stamp Act without properly examining the recitals of the document where the relationship of the donor and the donee was clearly mentioned and without looking into the provisions of Sections 2 and 3 of the Stamp Act, therefore, the order could not be sustained.
In re Maxwell Co. Pvt (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh) Question 1 Whether activity of printing of question papers on behalf of educational institution can be classified as activity of supply of goods or supply of services? Answer 1:- The activity of printing of question papers by the applicant is activity of supply of services classifiable […]
In re Rajeev Kumar Garg (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh) (1) Whether supply of food items at GMUs (General Minor Units) at Railway Platforms which include only counter sale of packed food items, drinks and cooked item shall be treated as ‘Sale of Goods’ or ‘Sale of Service’? Ans 1:– Supply of Food items at GMUs […]
In re G S Products (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh) (a) Whether they are correct in their classification of the filter Elements & Air Filter Assembly mentioned above as parts for Diesel Electric Locomotive for Indian Railways under Tariff Heading 8607 in GST regime or not? Ans: Yes, The correct classification of the Filter Elements & […]
In re M/S Vedant Synergy Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Rajasthan) The goods and services supplied by the applicant are classifiable under HSN 998316 (Information technology infrastructure and network management services) attracting GST @ 18% (SGST 9% + CGST 9%). FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING RAJASTHAN Note: Under Section 100 of the CGST/RGST […]
In re Arvind Kumar Agrawa (GST AAAR Odisha) In the Customs Tariff, goods of the same class have been grouped together. Also, the residuary items have been provided separately for each class of goods under each chapter. The Notes to the Tariff, giving explanation to the scope and ambit of the respective chapter have statutory […]
he assessment order passed in the name of non-existent entity, i.e., Amdocs Business Services (P) Ltd. was invalid and subsequent proceedings arising therefrom were vitiated. The assessment made in the name of non-existent company was, therefore, invalid and unsustainable in the eye of law.
