Where assessee had furnished relevant evidences such as copies of bank statement, demat account, share purchase documents and share certificate., etc., to prove its bogus long-term capital gain on sale of shares and no adverse material had been brought on record by AO to disprove the claim of assessee, addition made under section 68 on account of unexplained credit could not be sustained.
In re Chinnakani Arumuga Selvaraja, Proprietor of M/s Sri Venkateshwara Traders (GST AAR Tamilnadu) The product ‘Cattle feed in cake form’ manufactured by the Applicant is classifiable under Chapter Heading 23099010 and stands exempted as per vide Sl.No. 102 of Notification No. 2/2017-Central Tax(Rate) dated 28th June 2017 as amended and Sl.No. 102 of Notification. […]
The product ‘Cattle feed in cake form’ manufactured by the Applicant is classifiable under Chapter Heading 23099010 and stands exempted as per vide Sl.No. 102 of Notification No. 2/2017-Central Tax(Rate) dated 28th June 2017
In re M/s. Madhya Pradesh Power generating Company Limited (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh) 1. Rate of GST on contract for construction of building and structure for colony at village Siveria at 2×660 MW Shree Singaji Thermal Power Project Stage -II Khandwa. As per Notification No. 11/2017 as amended by Notification No. 24/2017 further amended vide […]
Addition under section 68 made by AO of the entire share capital and premium received during the year on the basis of negative observation about availability of funds with share applicant was unjustified as the share applicant was the sister concern of assessee, from whom similar share application with premium were received in the earlier year and the balance sheet of the share applicant showed ample source of funds.
In re Shiroki Technico India Private Ltd. (GST AAR Haryana) Whether the product; namely ‘seat adjuster’ merit classification under Serial No. 170 as per Notification No. 1/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 or under Serial No. 435A of Notification No. 1/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 as amended by Notification No. 41/2017- Central Tax (Rate) […]
The issue under consideration is that whether the assessee having business of land trading can show capital gains from arising out of transfer of land and claim exemption u/s 54F?
Lokesh Chandrappa Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court) It is trite law that the Assessing Officer has a legal obligation to implement the order of the ITAT strictly and such failure would result in the failure of justice. A writ of mandamus would be issued in such circumstances to the respondent – Assessing Officer to carry […]
In re M/s. Chennai Port Trust (GST AAR Tamilnadu) The applicant is not entitled to take credit of input tax charged on the inward supply of medical, diagnostic equipment, apparatus, instruments, consumables, disposables, spares and repairing services for these, which are used to provide medical facilities to the employees, pensioners and dependents in the in-house […]
The applicant is not entitled to take credit of input tax charged on the inward supply of medicines which are used to provide medical facilities to the employees, pensioners and dependants in the in-house hospital.
