ITAT Bangalore held that penalty under section 271D of the Income Tax Act not leviable in terms of section 273B of the Income Tax Act since claim of exemption u/s. 54 is made in an open and bonafide manner.
Gujarat High Court held that Fly Ash Bricks and Fly Ash Blocks containing less than 90% fly ash content is liable to 5% GST and not 18% GST. Accordingly, order passed by advance ruling authority set aside.
Integrated Goods and Services Tax ( IGST ) on ocean freight could not be levied on Free on Board ( FOB ) transactions also as once the IGST was paid on value of goods including the freight, cost and insurance, it would not make any difference between the transactions was on CIF basis or FOB basis
Dinesh Kumar vs Directorate General of GST Intelligence (District Court of Maharashtra) Pune Additional Sessions Judge Grants Bail in GST Evasion Case In the case of Dinesh Kumar vs Directorate General of GST Intelligence (4596/2024), the applicant, Dinesh Kumar, was arrested by the Directorate General of GST Intelligence, Pune Zonal Unit, for offenses under Section […]
Upon further examination of the assessee’s bank statements, the Assessing Officer observed that significant funds were being transferred in and out to various parties.
Vide the present petition, the petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Appellate Authority, whereby the order of cancellation of registration passed by the Assessing Officer has been upheld and the appeal was dismissed on the ground of limitation.
On various occasions, this Court has held that if excess stock is found, then proceedings under sections 73/74 of the GST Act should be pressed in service and not proceedings under section 130 of the GST Act, read with rule 120 of the Rules framed under the Act.
The assessee is an individual and engaged in the business of retail milk selling. For the relevant AY 2012-13, the assessee did not originally file a return of income, as the total income was below the basic exemption limit under the Act.
ITAT Delhi held that assessment order under section 153A of the Income Tax Act quashed as assessment has been framed not based on any incriminating material found during the course of search.
Madras High Court held that passing of ex-parte order and confirming demand with regard to mismatch of tax liability set aside with direction to give one more opportunity of being heard.
