Delhi High Court held that Form ITNS-150 sets out quantum of tax determination to be paid by assessee in an order u/s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, thus any amendment thereof is to be made within time limit prescribed under section 154(7) of the Income Tax Act.
Bombay High Court held that reopening of assessment by AO by merely acting under dictation or on borrowed satisfaction without independent application of mind to materials on record is not justifiable in law. Hence, appeal of revenue liable to be dismissed.
NCLT Bengaluru held that insufficiently stamped/ unstamped agreements do not present a bar to a Section 7 application under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Thus, since default in payment of financial debt established, application u/s. 7 admitted.
Gulshan Investment Pvt. Ltd. Vs JCIT (OSD) (ITAT Delhi) No Addition u/s 153A without incriminating material found during search – Statements of third parties not sufficient: ITAT Delhi Gulshan Investment Pvt. Ltd & others Vs JCIT -ITA No.3872/Del/2024 dt 16.4.25 The core dispute involves additions made by the AO u/s 153A following a search & […]
ITAT Kolkata rules no legal requirement for knowhow registration to claim depreciation under Section 32. Landis + Gyr case summary.
Delhi High Court says writ jurisdiction isn’t the place to decide an accountant’s role in GST ITC fraud; directs appeal.
Delhi ITAT quashes reassessment in Vijender Nath Gupta case, citing AO’s failure to properly quantify escaped income during reopening.
ITAT Delhi rules Crocs Inc.’s service income not taxable in India under DTAA, as services did not “make available” technical knowledge to Crocs India.
CESTAT Kolkata sets aside penalty on Rakesh Magoo, citing lack of evidence and violation of natural justice in customs undervaluation case.
Delhi ITAT: Section 153D approval requires specific application of mind per assessment year, not blanket or mechanical. Assessment quashed.
