Bombay High Court dismisses petition challenging case transfer of Laxminath Investment to Delhi under Section 127(2), citing valid reasons and procedural compliance.
Calcutta High Court quashes GST registration cancellation, allowing restoration upon compliance. Review key judgments and implications in the C.P. George case.
ITAT Mumbai upholds CIT(A)’s decision favoring Jay Bharat Mehta, rejecting unexplained cash credit addition and affirming Section 54F deduction eligibility.
Calcutta High Court overturns GST cancellation for non-filing, allowing restoration upon compliance. Key directives and implications in Bengal Co-operative case.
Bombay High Court invalidates reopening notice and assessment order against Jayant Avinash Dave, citing procedural lapses and unreasonable decision-making.
The Gurugram CJM Court deemed the arrest of Yogesh Gupta by a GST officer illegal, citing non-compliance with procedural laws under the CrPC and BNSS Act.
Bombay High Court held that once it is established that there is no cheating involved under the IPC then there is no proceeds of crime involved u/s. 2(1)(u) of PMLA and therefore there is no Money Laundering involved under Section 3 of PMLA in the present case.
CESTAT Kolkata held that Asansol Durgapur Development Authority [ADDA] performing sovereign functions on behalf of the State Government of West Bengal is exempt from service tax. Accordingly, service tax not leviable.
ITAT Mumbai held that addition towards section 68 of the Income Tax Act deleted as assessee discharged initial onus by proving identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of transaction. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
In the assessee’s own case for A.Y. 2001-02, the Coordinate Bench had upheld the CIT(A)’s decision to allow 40% of the damages under Section 14B of the Act as compensatory while treating the balance 60% as penal in nature and disallowing the same.
