CAAR Mumbai dismisses Viewsonic Technologies’ advance ruling application on data projectors, citing a pending case before the Madras High Court.
CAAR Mumbai denies Audio Distribution House Pvt Ltd’s request for advance ruling on Optoma Interactive Flat Panels, citing prior CESTAT Delhi judgment.
CAAR Mumbai ruled on the classification of ViewSonic Interactive Flat Panels under Customs Tariff heading 8471. Case linked to prior CESTAT Delhi judgment.
CAAR Mumbai rejects Viewsonic India’s advance ruling request on data projector classification, citing pending appeal before Madras High Court.
Advance ruling on Apple Watch and bands’ classification under Customs Tariff Act. Insights on tariff headings, disputes, and applicability for renewal.
Tamil Nadu AAR rules that school transport services provided directly to students are not exempt from GST under Notification No.12/2017. Read the full analysis.
The Assessee is aggrieved by the information received pursuant to application under Right to Information Act, 2015, whereby the Assessee became aware that the Assessing Officer (AO) had not resumed proceedings in respect of AY 2007-08.
Maharashtra AAR rules fish finders are not parts of vessels under HSN 8901-8907, impacting GST rates for trading companies.
Maharashtra AAR rules stipend reimbursement to training firms is exempt from GST, clarifying pure agent status in industry partnerships.
ITAT Mumbai held that exercising revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income Tax Act by PCIT on the basis of factual misconception is liable to be quashed. Accordingly, appeal allowed and order u/s. 263 quashed.
