Bombay High Court sets aside IT refund adjustments for Sulzer Pumps, citing lack of proper notice under Section 245 of the Income Tax Act.
Delhi High Court sets aside GST demand order against APN Sales & Marketing, citing lack of proper notice, and remands the case for reconsideration.
Calcutta High Court dismisses Jyoti Tar Products’ writ petition on denied ITC due to supplier’s cancellation, directing the petitioner to seek an appellate remedy.
Karnataka High Court held that once the dispute is referred to the Labour Court or the Tribunal, the Government will have no power to pass interim order under Section 10-B. Further, passing of interim order without hearing the management is against the principles of natural justice.
Allahabad High Court upholds GST provisional attachment against Rajat Infra Developers, citing tax evasion. Petitioner may appeal under Section 74 of GST Act.
CESTAT Delhi held that FOB value is the transaction value and customs officer has no right to interfere/ modify the FOB value of the goods. Thus, appeal of exporter’s allowed and order set aside.
The assessee is a Public Sector Undertaking of Government of India and is in the business of Non-Life Insurance, The assessee offers insurance covers for large projects like power plants, petrochemical, steel and chemical plants.
During the course of search and seizure operation, several incriminating documents related to the assessee were found and seized from the residential premises of Shri Prashant Bongirwar.
Analysis of heat sink classification under Indian Customs Tariff for washing machines & refrigerators, based on the CAAR Mumbai ruling for Samsung India Electronics.
Customs Authority for Advance Rulings, Mumbai, reviews the classification of digital cinema projectors under Indian customs law, analyzing tariff headings 8528 and 9007.
