ITAT Nagpur sets aside CIT(E)’s rejection of 12A registration, holding assessee not liable for file access issues on ITBA portal.
Madras High Court held that advocates shall maintain professional integrity and do not engage in acts that could mislead the public or undermine the legal profession. Court ordered detailed enquiry regarding a fake law firm operated by a non-advocate.
ITAT Pune rules one-time membership and share fees as capital receipts for Veershaiv Cooperative Bank, reversing lower authority’s revenue classification.
ITAT Pune grants partial relief in cash deposit case during demonetization under Section 69A. Dispute centered on unexplained deposits of ₹21.4 lakh.
ITAT Pune quashes PCIT’s Section 263 order against Shree Balaji Associates, stating AO made inquiries; no lack of inquiry found.
Supreme Court held that as there was no privity of contract between the concerned parties therein, no ‘deficiency’ would arise and the action (complaint) would not be maintainable before the concerned Consumer Forum.
NCLT Mumbai approved resolution plan of Corporate Debtor [Cane Agro Energy (India) Ltd] as submitted by resolution applicant [M/s. Raigaon Sugar & Power Ltd.] as resolution plan meets requirements of section 30(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
It is submitted that if the rectification as sought for is allowed, the petitioner would be entitled to a refund of 74,61,65,427/- for the period between July 2017 to November 2017.
NCLT Chandigarh held that since resolution plan in respect of Nav Jyoti Agro Foods Private Limited meets requirement of section 30(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 the same stands approved as filed by the resolution professional.
ITAT Mumbai held that as per circular no. 6 of 2016 dated 29th February 2016, it is clear that it is the assessee who decides whether the shares are held as investment or stock-in-trade. Thus, here since shares are held as investments, gains are taxable as capital gains.
