ITAT Jodhpur partly allows appeal in Kishana Ram vs ITO, upholding additions related to capital discrepancies and agricultural income under Section 143(3).
ITAT Kolkata cancels penalty u/s 271D for Tarai Transport Corporation in AY 2016-17, citing reasonable cause and a similar past ruling involving cash transactions with a sister concern.
ITAT Rajkot cancels penalty on Anil Odedara, ruling income was estimated and not grounds for concealment under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Jaipur sets aside addition and penalty against Mukesh Kumar Agarwal due to lack of valid jurisdiction and time-barred penalty order.
ITAT Raipur sets aside assessment against Adarsh Rice Mill due to lack of jurisdiction under Section 147. Merits of the case remain undecided.
CESTAT Delhi sets aside service tax on consultancy and penalties for MPPTCL; upholds tax on hire charges. Order modifies previous tax demand.
CESTAT Delhi sets aside service tax demand on penalties, ruling South Eastern Coalfields’ liquidated damages not taxable as declared service under Section 66E(e).
CESTAT Delhi rules against service tax demand on Northern Coalfields Ltd. for penalties, liquidated damages, and forfeited deposits, citing lack of service provision.
ITAT Raipur held that reassessment proceedings under section 147 of the Income Tax Act without any fresh material, amounts to mere change of opinion, and hence the same is not sustainable in law.
Supreme Court held that in the case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [NI Act], complainant is not required to show evidence that he had the financial capacity. Accordingly, appeal of appellant allowed.