ITAT Delhi quashes an addition made by the DCIT against Virender Verma, finding the accommodation entry allegation unproven due to lack of supporting material and an unrelated seized ledger.
The matter was examined on the GST Portal, and it was verified that several consignments were delivered in two-wheelers, three-wheelers or cars. The registration numbers of many vehicles declared to have transported the goods from outside the State were found to be fake.
Uttarakhand High Court rules GST confiscation invalid if solely based on driver’s reply without owner’s hearing, citing Section 130(4) CGST Act violation.
The ITAT Delhi set aside a reassessment order against Aashiyana Infrastructure Development Pvt. Ltd., citing a violation of CBDT instructions on jurisdictional limits, as the DCIT passed the order instead of the ITO.
Allahabad High Court stays an order against Sri Sai Vishwas Polymers, ruling it invalid as it was passed after the omission of GST Rule 96(10) without a saving provision.
Bombay High Court stays GST demand on assignment of long-term leasehold rights, citing Gujarat High Court’s view on immovable property transfers.
Jharkhand High Court enhanced the amount of permanent alimony by directing to pay a sum of Rs. 50,000 per month to wife who has no other source of income and Rs. 40,000 per month to son who is suffering from Autism.
ITAT Pune reduced ad-hoc disallowances on salary, advertisement, vehicle, and travel expenses to 10% for Prafulla Shantilal Kothari, citing audited books and no specific defects.
ITAT Delhi held that intimation under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act being passed without waiting for the response of the assessee and without providing thirty day time for filing response is not sustainable in law. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
Calcutta High Court overturns Section 148A(d) income tax order for AY 2018-19, citing natural justice violation due to lack of personal hearing. Case remanded for re-evaluation.
