Delhi High Court held that appeal under section 35G of the Central Excise Act before High Court is not maintainable whenever issues of determining taxability are involved. Accordingly, present appeal is rejected.
ITAT Delhi held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act towards unexplained cash credit cannot be sustained as cash deposit already included in turnover declared by the assessee in return of income. Accordingly, addition is directed to be deleted.
ITAT Bangalore held that eligibility u/s. 80P should be assessed in the light of the relevant state cooperative law. Under Karnataka Cooperation Societies Act [KCSA], the presence of nominal and associate members is lawful and does not break the mutuality principle.
The Appellant submitted that, despite repeated follow-ups, the Respondent has failed to pay the outstanding balance. The Appellant issued a notice under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking recovery of the said dues.
The petitioner filed return of income for the Assessment Year 2013-14 on 28.04.2016. A notice dated 30.6.2021 was issued u/s. 148 of the Act under the provisions of the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 (TOLA).
The Gujarat High Court confirmed that transferring long-term leasehold rights for GIDC plots is not subject to GST, classifying it as a transfer of immovable property, similar to a land sale. This clarifies GST applicability for industrial land transactions.
ITAT Ahmedabad allows Khedbrahma Taluka Primary Teachers Co-op. Credit Society Ltd. 80P deduction despite a minor delay in IT return filing, citing technical glitches and statutory interpretation.
The ITAT Delhi has allowed an 80IC deduction for Mantangi Rubber Pvt. Ltd. despite a 46-minute delay in return filing, deeming Section 80AC directory and emphasizing justice.
The Delhi High Court has ruled against the “negative blocking” of Electronic Credit Ledgers, citing that such actions exceed the scope of Rule 86A of the CGST Rules.
Mumbai ITAT rules in favor of M.K. Shelters, quashing income additions for multiple years. The tribunal cited insufficient evidence linking the dormant firm to alleged cash transactions and noted critical procedural errors by the Assessing Officer in the reassessment.
