Until the goods are appropriated by the stockyards/warehouses from out of the stocks available with them, they continue in the inventory of the stockyards/warehouses. Thus, supplies made to the stockyards/warehouses are merely stock transfers.
Madras High Court held that non-granting sufficient time to the petitioner for furnishing reply results into lack of opportunities being provided to the petitioner. Accordingly, order passed thereon is liable to be set aside.
Gauhati High Court denied to transfer large scale financial fraud case from Aizawl to Assam since sufficient number of witnesses have been listed by the IO to prove the case and there appears to be no compelling reason to transfer the cases.
NCLAT Delhi held that appellant to be treated as secured Financial Creditor based on the registered charge with CERSAI in accordance with Regulation 21 of the IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016. Accordingly, appeal allowed and order set aside.
The Madras High Court has addressed a tax dispute involving Tvl. Aro Granite Industries Ltd., directing an assessing authority to re-evaluate a slump sale claim independently, free from prior appellate observations.
Delhi High Court held that payments received for services that may require technical expertise, technical inventions or technology would not qualify as Fees for Technical Services under Article 13 of the India-UK DTAA. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
The Kerala High Court affirmed the validity of Section 5A of the Kerala Building Tax Act, classifying it as a building tax, not a luxury tax, but restricted recovery to a three-year period.
The Gauhati High Court has ordered the restoration of a GST registration after the petitioner paid all outstanding dues, citing a similar precedent.
Madras High Court sets aside Customs order against Spac Starch due to non-receipt of notices, citing natural justice. Case remanded for fresh hearing.
ITAT Delhi held that addition towards earning fictitious profit by misusing Client Code Modification Facility merely on the basis of information received from Investigation wing without carrying out independent investigation is unsustainable in law. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
