The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Nagpur condoned a 729-day delay in Rupa Abhay Vyas’s appeal, citing the death of her legal counsel during the COVID-19 pandemic and her subsequent medical diagnosis.
he Customs Authority for Advance Rulings (CAAR) in Delhi rejected Niterra India Pvt. Ltd.’s application for a ruling on the classification of NOx sensors. The rejection was based on Section 28-I(2)(b) of the Customs Act, 1962, as the issue had already been decided by the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in a separate case.
The Customs Authority for Advance Rulings (CAAR), Delhi, has rejected an application by Great Nuts Impex Private Limited regarding the classification of ‘Roasted Supari.’ The decision, based on Section 28-I(2)(b) of the Customs Act, holds that a ruling cannot be issued on a matter already decided by a High Court, even if the applicant wasn’t a party to the prior case.
Tribunal held that technical issues in filing Form 56F cannot bar deduction under Section 10AA. Meghmani LLP’s Rs. 4.82 crore claim allowed as form submission was directory, not mandatory.
The Customs Authority for Advance Rulings has rejected an application for a ruling on Scented Supari classification, citing an existing High Court judgment on the matter.
In a case concerning a real estate transaction, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad, held that an assessment under Section 153C was invalid as no incriminating material was found from the assessee.
The ITAT in Hyderabad has remanded the case of Capital Fortunes to the AO, ruling that the CIT(A) was not justified in dismissing the appeal on a technicality. The tribunal held that genuine claims, such as set-off of losses and dividend exemption, must be decided on their merits.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Nagpur has invalidated reassessment proceedings against Mithilesh Jagdeo Singh Pawar, ruling that the case was reopened on a matter already examined during the original scrutiny assessment.
The ITAT Hyderabad has ruled that a 1060-day delay in filing an appeal can be condoned if statutory notices were sent to an incorrect email address, preventing the assessee from becoming aware of the proceedings.
The ITAT Ahmedabad quashed a PCIT order, ruling that revisional power cannot be invoked for mere verification, and a specific error must be proven to show prejudice to revenue.
