ITAT Raipur sets aside additions against N.R. Ispat & Power Pvt. Ltd. citing lack of incriminating material in search proceedings for AYs 2010-11 to 2018-19.
The Andhra Pradesh High Court has set aside an order rejecting FedEx’s GST refund claim. The court remanded the case, citing a lack of natural justice and the right to present additional evidence.
CAAR Mumbai holds anti-dumping duty not applicable on imported laser sources as they are parts, not complete machines under Customs Notification No. 15/2023
CAAR Mumbai clarifies tariff classification of roasted, shelled, and nitrogen-treated cashew nuts. Diced cashews held to be broken under specific Customs code.
CAAR Mumbai rules Wi-Fi receiver enclosures as parts under CTH 8517 79 90 of Customs Tariff Act, rejecting confidentiality plea due to public product details.
The CAAR has ruled that roller and sorter conveyors imported by Daifuku Intralogistics are to be classified as “Other conveyors” under CTI 84282019, not as parts.
A summary of the Supreme Court’s landmark 2012 ruling in BALCO v. Kaiser, which defined the territorial limits of Indian courts in foreign-seated arbitration.
The Bangalore ITAT directs the grant of a trust’s 12AB registration, ruling that low initial expenditure is not a valid reason for rejection. The court emphasizes that the genuineness of a trust’s activities is the key factor.
The Bangalore ITAT has quashed a 143(1) intimation against an educational trust, ruling the tax authority failed to provide the mandatory 30-day response period.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that applying Standard Operating Procedure [SOP] of CBDT, a cash deposit of 2,50,000/- by an individual without business income should be treated as prima facie explained. Hence, addition u/s. 69 to that extent is not justifiable.
