LLP and its partner(s) are distinct persons. As per Regulations 19A(2), it is the LLP which should meet the minimum net-worth criteria of INR 10 Crores. Thus, an LLP not meeting the minimum net worth criteria of at least Rs. 10 Crores, would not be an eligible ‘angel investor’ even if its partners qualify as’angel […]
In pursuance of Board’s Circular 40/2020 – Customs dated 04.09.2020, the roll-out of Faceless Assessment at an All India level in all ports of import and for all imported goods has to be enabled by 31.10.2020. The detailed roll-out plan in phases covering different Customs Zones and Chapters of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, including the existing Phases I and II, has been given in Annexure I of the aforesaid Circular.
Prison, as a deterrent and an institution of correctional administration, is a key constituent of criminal justice system. Imprisonment besides being a mode of punishment also aims at protecting the society from criminal activities. A balance is, therefore, considered essential between ensuring the rights of inmates and protecting the society from further harm.
Directorate General of Systems and Data Management, Bengaluru Zonal Unit has been given the mandate of development of Investigation (Enforcement) sub-module under the Dispute Settlement and Resolution (DSR) module of ACES-GST application. Directorate General of GST Intelligence – DGGI (then DGCEI) – CBIC is the Business owner of this sub module and a committee as formed by DGGI had submitted the business requirements for the Investigation sub-module.
GST Investigation module has been designed keeping the current work flow in a distinct CBIC’s investigative Unit’s functions and to replace the manual and paper based environment with a digital mode.
In terms of Clause 5 of Schedule C of PIT Regulations, compliance officer is responsible for maintaining restricted list on a confidential basis. Such restricted list shall be used by the compliance officer for approving or rejecting applications made for pre-clearance of trades.
CBDT issues Detailed guidelines for the implementation of Faceless Assessment Scheme, 2019 and role of residual charges in this regard. F. No.173/165/2020 -ITA-I Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central Board of Direct Taxes ***** New Delhi, dated 14th August, 2020 To, All PrCCsIT, Subject: Guidelines for the implementation of Faceless Assessment […]
India has a large network of Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (‘DTAAs’ or ‘Tax Treaties’, hereinafter) with various countries. The DTAAs, inter-alia, provide rules and mechanisms for allocation of taxing rights amongst the treaty partners; avoidance of economic and juridical double taxation; and resolution of taxation not in accordance with the treaty through the Mutual Agreement Procedure (‘MAP’, hereinafter).
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (the Code) mandates the Resolution Professional (RP) and the liquidator to determine if the Corporate Debtor (CD) has been subject to Avoidance transactions such as preferential transactions, fraudulent transactions, undervalued transactions, and extortionate transactions in the past, and if so, casts an obligation on the Insolvency Professional (IP) to file an application to the Adjudicating Authority (AA) for appropriate directions.
Though erstwhile rules 44G and 44H were in existence for a number of years, detailed information regarding MAP processes and guidance on issues related to such processes were not available in a comprehensive and consolidated manner.
