Notification No. 56/2012-Customs (ADD) Seeks to modify final anti-dumping duty on imports of Cable Ties, originating in, or exported from the People’s Republic of China and Taiwan and imported into India, imposed vide Notification No. 44/2009-Customs dated 30th April, 2009
Notification No.55 /2012-Customs (ADD) Seeks to levy anti-dumping duty on imports of Sodium Hydrosulphite, originating in, or exported from People’s Republic of China, for a further period of five years
G.S.R.889 (E). – In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) and (5) of section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), read with rules 18, 20 and 22 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury)
G.S.R. 888(E). – Whereas, in the matter of import of Vitrified Porcelain Tiles (hereinafter referred to as the subject goods), falling under Chapter 69 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) (hereinafter referred to as the Customs Tariff Act) and originating in, or exported from the People’s Republic of China (China PR) and United Arab Emirates (UAE) (hereinafter referred to as the subject countries), the designated authority, vide its final findings in notification No.37/1/2001-DGAD, dated the 5 th February, 2003 in the original anti-dumping case published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part I, Section 1, dated the 5 th February, 2003 had come to the conclusion that—
G.S.R. 881 (E).-WHEREAS, the designated authority vide notification No. 21/29/2011-DGAD, dated the 5th October, 2012, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part I, Section 1, dated the 5th October, 2012, had initiated review, in terms of sub-section (5) of section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) read with rule 23 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995, in the matter of continuation of anti-dump
G.S.R. (E). – Whereas in the matter of import of Digital Offset Printing Plates (hereinafter referred to as the subject goods), originating in or exported from the Peoples’ Republic of China (China PR) and Japan (hereinafter referred to as the subject countries) and imported into India, the designated authority, vide its preliminary findings F.No. 14/7/2011-DGAD, dated the 16th March, 2012, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part I, Section 1, dated the 16th March, 2012, had come to the conclusion that –
New Delhi, dated 29th November, 2012 Notification No. 50/2012-Customs (ADD) G.S.R. (E). –Whereas the designated authority vide notification No. 15/12/2012-DGAD, dated the 22nd November, 2012, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part I, Section 1 dated the 22nd November, 2012 has initiated review in terms of sub-section (5) of section 9A of the Customs […]
Notification No.49 /2012-Customs (ADD), Whereas, the designated authority, vide its notification No. 15/28/2010-DGAD, dated the 2nd September, 2011 published in Part I, Section I of the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, dated the 2nd September, 2011, had initiated a sunset review in the matter of continuation of anti-dumping on imports of Sodium Hydroxide commonly known as Caustic Soda,
Notification No. 48/2012-Customs (ADD) – Seeks to levy definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of Melamine, originating in or exported from the European Union, Iran. Indonesia and Japan for a further period of 5 Years.
Notification No. 47/2012-Customs (ADD) Whereas, the designated authority vide notification No. 15/35/2010-DGAD, dated the 3rd August, 2011, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part I, Section 1, had initiated review in terms of sub-section (5) of section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) (hereinafter referred to as the said Customs Tariff Act) read with rule 23 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles
