Income Tax : Learn about Section 194T introduced in Finance Bill 2024, covering TDS on payments to partners, its implications, and potential c...
CA, CS, CMA : Stay informed with February 2024 legal obligations & updates in India. From Income Tax to GST, understand forms, filing dates, & s...
Income Tax : Learn how to respond to a defective return notice under Section 139(9) of the Income Tax Act. Steps for correction and consequence...
Income Tax : Explore key issues in Budget 2024, including tax rectification delays, unjust tax rates, exorbitant TCS on foreign travel, and nee...
Income Tax : Learn about the new Section 194T, its implications on TDS for partners' remuneration, and the interplay with Section 40(b) from th...
Income Tax : Understand PFA and defective return queries for ITR 1-6 for AY 24-25, including MAT applicability, TDS/TCS claims, and income disc...
Income Tax : CBDT's new circular relaxes TDS/TCS rules for deceased deductees/collectees before PAN-Aadhaar linking, eliminating tax liability ...
Income Tax : Budget 2024 extends the scope for lower deduction/collection certificates under Sections 197 and 206C, effective from October 2024...
Income Tax : Budget 2024 reduces penalty relief period for TDS/TCS statement filing from one year to one month. Changes effective April 2025....
Income Tax : Budget 2024 introduces a six-year limit for filing TDS/TCS correction statements. Amendments to sections 200 and 206C will be effe...
Income Tax : Supreme Court rules Vodafone Idea is not liable for TDS on payments to foreign telecom operators. The decision aligns with earlier...
Income Tax : ITAT Hyderabad held that dismissal of appeal by CIT(A) on the ground of non-deposition of self-assessment tax by the assessee need...
Income Tax : The assessee had filed return of income of Rs.92,06,590 which was selected for complete scrutiny and during the course of assessme...
Income Tax : Delhi High Court held that in case of search, block period of ten years for search assessment, would not be attracted in case the ...
Income Tax : Understand the Ahmedabad ITAT ruling that payments for certification services by foreign entities are not taxable in India without...
Income Tax : Income Tax Circular 08/2024 exempts higher TDS/TCS rates if deductee/collectee dies before PAN-Aadhaar linkage, addressing taxpay...
Income Tax : RBI exempted from Section 206AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, via Ministry of Finance notification dated May 27, 2024. Learn more a...
Income Tax : Learn about CBDT Circular No. 6/2024 offering relief to TDS deductors for transactions up to March 31, 2024, when PAN becomes oper...
Income Tax : Discover how TDS charge officers verify high-risk refund cases using Insight Instruction No. 76. Learn about the SOP, steps, and f...
Income Tax : Discover the latest Circular from the Ministry of Finance, India, outlining measures to reduce tax litigation by specifying condit...
In the instant case, the tax has not deducted the TDS due to wrong classification of the payments made which was included under the heading ‘purchases’ and the purchases do not attract the TDS, whereas the sub contract payments attract TDS.
The contract of guarantee does not give any rise to principal – agent relationship between the assessee and the bank and, therefore, the consideration received by the bank on account of guarantee commission cannot be reckoned as commission as contemplated under section 194H and accordingly, there was no requirement to deduct TDS on this payment.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata bench recently ordered that the penalty u/s 271C of the Income Tax Act cannot be levied for the delayed deduction of TDS amount.
Addition on account of discount extended to prepaid distributors Third proviso to section 194H will get attracted only when the nature of payment is “commission or brokerage”. Parties before us agree that majorly the distribution of products by BSNL and MTNL takes place through Public Call Office franchisees since this was an infrastructure existing with […]
Though the amount was credited to her account in the books of accounts of the assessee, the payment was not made to her and before making the payment and filing the return of income, the assessee had obtained the form 15G and forwarded to the Ld. CIT. Since the recipient was not having taxable income, obtaining form 15G before making the payment would be sufficient compliance and hence, we hold that the addition u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act does not attract.
It is an important aspect to be examined whether Recipient- Assessee has directly paid tax or has no liability of tax at all. Since this aspect was not examined by Assessing Authority, therefore, in our view, Tribunal has rightly remanded matter to Assessing Authority to examine this aspect.
What was common to both the provisos to section 40(a)(ia) and section 210(1) was that as long as the payee/resident had filed its return of income disclosing the payment received by and in which the income earned by it was embedded and had also paid tax on such income, the assessee would not be treated as a person in default.
Out of these four appeals two appeals are filed by the assessee while the other two appeals are filed by the Revenue for against the orders of the CIT(A) – 4, Mumbai dated 13.02.2017 and 06.02.2017 for assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13 respectively.
Where on account of an inadvertent error, PAN of the deductee was wrongly mentioned by assessee, in TDS return, AO was not justified in not permitting the assessee to correct PAN of the deductee, putting the limitation of permitting corrections of only four characters. The case was, therefore, remanded.
TDS requirement under section 194C is not applicable to transactions of purchase of goods, therefore, no disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) could be made.
