Income Tax Tax Deductions related News, Article, Notification, Judgments covering all section Including Section 80C, 80D, 80TTA, 80HHC, 80JJA
Income Tax : The eligibility period for startup tax exemption has been extended to March 31, 2030. Startups must meet DPIIT and compliance cond...
Income Tax : Understand how Chapter VIII reshapes deductions with strict conditions, structured sections, and limits. Learn key compliance rule...
Income Tax : The issue concerned whether deductions under section 80GGC could be denied solely on investigation inputs alleging accommodation e...
Income Tax : The issue highlights that automated messages questioning donation deductions lack clarity on mismatches, forcing donors to revise ...
Income Tax : Know about TAN under Section 203A of the Income Tax Act—its purpose, applicability, application process, forms, penalties, and k...
Income Tax : This explainer breaks down how Section 80G deductions work and who can claim them. It highlights deduction categories, qualifying ...
Corporate Law : Finance Bill 2024 updates Section 80G to reflect "National Sports Development Fund" and changes approval procedures for charities....
Income Tax : Learn about the amended provisions allowing non-government employers to deduct up to 14% of employee salaries for pension scheme ...
Income Tax : Section 35AC of the Income Tax Act, as amended by the Finance Act, 2016, provides that no deduction under this section shall be al...
Income Tax : Press Information Bureau Government of India Ministry of Finance 26-November-2015 09:44 IST Date for sending comments by the stake...
Income Tax : The Tribunal upheld deletion of disallowance where the tax authority failed to produce direct evidence linking the taxpayer to any...
Income Tax : Bombay High Court granted interim relief to a co-operative credit society, restraining coercive tax recovery in a Section 80P dedu...
Income Tax : The High Court found no mistake apparent on record to warrant rectification under Section 254, holding that the Tribunal's decisio...
Income Tax : ITAT Panaji ruled that cooperative societies can claim a deduction under Section 80P even if they filed their return late, but onl...
Income Tax : The ITAT has denied a deduction under Section 80ID for Ramesh Bhatia HUF, ruling that a previously used hotel building doesn't qua...
Income Tax : CBDT corrigendum adds Sikkim to the list of eligible states for income tax deductions under Section 80-IE for North-Eastern undert...
Income Tax : CBDT issues corrigendum adding Sikkim to Schedule 80-IE for income tax deductions under Section 80-IE for North-Eastern undertakin...
Income Tax : TDS on agents commission reduced from 5% to 2% as per the Finance Bill 2024. New rate effective from October 1, 2024, under Sectio...
Company Law : NFRA issues order penalizing CA Pawan Jain and Mis Kumar Jain & Associates for lapses in issuing reports under Income Tax Act for ...
Income Tax : Check out Income Tax Notification 57/2023 issued by the Ministry of Finance, offering tax deduction relaxation for ship lease paym...
Normally, transportation is after or post manufacture. The onus was on the assessee to show and establish that, because of the peculiarity of facts, transportation charges should be treated as sale proceeds or part of sale proceeds of the goods manufactured and were intrinsically connected and had live link with the manufacturing activity. In the absence of aforesaid evidence and material placed by the assessee, the transportation charges cannot be treated as profit and gain derived from the manufacturing activity, which qualifies for deduction under section 80-I.
The facts of the present case are similar only in the case in I.T.A. No.350/Del/.2009 wherein the Hon’ble Delhi Bench ‘D’ has dealt with the similar issue which was at ground No.3 of the appeal. The Tribunal has held in favour of the assessee and had remitted back file to the office of Assessing Officer for consideration of claim of assessee u/s 80IB. While deciding the matter, the Hon’ble Tribunal had considered various judicial pronouncements in which it was held that the authorities under the Act are under an obligation to act in accordance with law. If an assessee under a mistake, misconception or not being properly instructed is over-assessed, the authorities under the Act are required to assist him and ensure that only legitimate taxes are collected.
Assessee owned only 38 guntas of land when he started the construction, he acquired an extent of 1,440 sq. ft. of land adjoining the said land, thus making the total land in which the project was put up, to 44,470 sq.ft. more than 43,480 sq.ft. which is prescribed under the law. The modified housing project was approved in the year 2001 after the aforesaid provision was inserted. On 20.5.2003 occupancy certificate is issued. Therefore, the construction is within the 4 years period stipulated.
In the said assessment year, the assessee had earned premium of Rs.12,26,140/- on sale of export quota. The Assessing Officer held that this premium is covered by Section 28 (iiia/b/c) and accordingly computed deduction under Section 80HHC but without giving benefit of provisos under sub Section (3) to Section 80HHC. He observed that the export turnover in the previous year was exceeding Rs.10 crores and the assessee had not complied with the several conditions mentioned in the provisos. The sale proceeds received from sale of quota rights were excluded from benefit under the provisos to Section 80HHC(3) as this was not the regular business income of the assessee.
The main issue raised by the DIT(E) is in respect of holding of conference of doctors at a five star hotel and the fact that the donors are pharmaceutical companies and some of them have deducted TDS. Adverse inference has also been drawn from extravagance of expenses the fact that the conference was of doctors and there is no benefit to the common public.
As per the amended law, development of infrastructure facility is sufficient for claim of deduction under section 80-IA(4) with effect from assessment year 2002-03. The relevant assessment year under consideration is also assessment year 2002-03 for which amended provisions of law is applicable.
In this case as found by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) the Assessing Officer in the course of assessment proceedings had called for the particulars regarding various items of income going into the computation of deduction under section 80HHC, for which the assessee had given the requisite details and particulars. Now the Assessing Officer has reopened the assessment to hold that the very same items of receipt has to be excluded in computing relief under section 80HHC. In other words, the Assessing Officer, on a reappraisal of the very same details, which was called for by him and furnished by the assessee, would like to come to a different conclusion. This clearly tantamounts to reopening is merely on a change of opinion.
Aviva Life Insurance today announced the launch of its online health plan – Aviva Health Secure. The plan provides the policyholder with a lump sum amount on diagnoses of any critical illness covered by the policy thereby ensuring that the family has adequate funds to meet the unplanned medical expenses and get the best possible treatment. Available exclusively on the online platform, Aviva Health Secure can be bought for a nominal premium starting Rs 2000 per year from www.avivaindia.com. While the minimum sum assured is Rs 5 lakh, the maximum is Rs 50 lakh. The plan can be bought by a person from 18 years to 55 years of age for a minimum policy term of 10 years and a maximum term of 30 years.
Inland Ports were specifically mentioned as an infrastructure facility in the statutory provision and in the understanding of the CBEC, which administers the Customs Act, an Inland Container Depot was actually an Inland Port. There is also no dispute that even in 1983 amendments had been made to the Customs Act by treating the Inland Container Depots as part of the customs port for purpose of customs formalities and clearances.
In the instant appeal, there are total three grounds. Ground No. 3 is general in nature. Ground Nos. 1 and 2 raises the same issue. Both impugn the directions issued by Ld. CIT (A) to the AO to re-compute the deduction u/s 80HHC in accordance with the decision of Hon’ble Special Bench of ITAT Mumbai in the case of Topman Exports 318 ITR 87 in view of the fact that the above decision has been reversed by the Hon’ble Bombay High Court on 29.6.2010.
