Goods and Services Tax : Kerala HC rules that GST orders under Section 73 must have digital or manual signatures to be valid, quashing impugned orders in t...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore Section 61 of CGST Act, covering scrutiny of GST returns, officer's authority, taxpayer obligations, and implications for ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Kerala SGST guidelines address the adjudication of multiple Show Cause Notices, ensuring consistency in decision-making across...
Goods and Services Tax : Learn about GST amnesty provisions for waiving interest, penalties, and regularizing ITC under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. Apply by...
Goods and Services Tax : Learn about GST return scrutiny under Section 61 of the CGST Act, 2017. Understand the process, objectives, and key areas of compl...
Goods and Services Tax : KSCAA highlights practical GST challenges in Sec 128A & Sec 16(4), urging clarifications on appeals, ITC, interest waivers, and mu...
Goods and Services Tax : Gauhati High Court held that the Summary of the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 is not a substitute to the Show Cause Notice to be...
Goods and Services Tax : The Supreme Court issues notice on a plea challenging GST notifications extending limitation for adjudication under Section 73 of ...
Goods and Services Tax : Calcutta High Court dismissed a plea challenging an SCN under the CGST Act, citing availability of a statutory appeal remedy under...
Goods and Services Tax : Assessee clarified that Form ST-3 was incorrect as some of the invoices inadvertently remained unaccounted for the said period and...
Goods and Services Tax : Gauhati High Court held that issuance of summary of the Show Cause Notice [SCN] doesn’t dispense with requirement of issuance of...
Goods and Services Tax : Kerala SGST issues guidelines on issuing separate notices for Sections 73 and 74. Ensures clarity and uniformity in handling GST d...
Detailed analysis of the CESTAT Mumbai’s decision to quash a show cause notice with contradictory statements in Maheshwari Transport vs. Commissioner of CE & ST case.
A detailed analysis of the case between Hiranandani Builders and Commissioner of Service Tax-VII in CESTAT Mumbai. Learn how the Tribunal ruled that Revenue has no authority to collect service tax from SEZ Developers.
Bombay High Court held that even if the assessee has failed to maintain a separate account it was entitled to reverse proportionate Cenvat Credit. The option of paying an amount equal to 10% of the value of exempted goods could not have been enforced on the assessee.
CESTAT Mumbai held that as registration numbers were purposefully omitted, accordingly, the genuineness of the invoices are doubtful, the invoices are categorized as inadmissible document.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act towards unexplained credit unsustainable as the assessee has been able to reasonably explain the source of gift from his mother.
CESTAT Chennai held that amount already paid towards the duty liability and interest before issuance of show cause notice. Notice issued only for levying penalty is untenable. Hence, levy of penalty u/s. 78 deleted.
CESTAT Kolkata held that Cenvat Credit can be utilized for payment of service tax on ‘import of services’. Accordingly, duty demand denying the same is unsustainable.
Analysis of Tvl. Raja Stores Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) ruling by the Madras High Court. Learn why a GST audit can’t be conducted on a closed business.
Bombay High Court held that show cause notice should be adjudicated within a reasonable time and there should not be an egregious, unjustified and unexplained inordinate delay.
Himachal Pradesh High Court allowed the writ petition and directed department not to act in furtherance of order passed by appellate authority till the time appellate tribunal in term of Section 109 of the Himachal Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 is constituted.
