Goods and Services Tax : Section 74A replaces the earlier Sections 73 and 74, creating a unified framework for tax recovery in cases of short payment, erro...
Goods and Services Tax : This case explains situations where ITC is availed and utilised without receipt of goods or services. The ruling clarifies that su...
Goods and Services Tax : Highlights how authorities routinely invoke Section 74 without evidence of fraud and explains courts’ stance that such notices a...
Goods and Services Tax : Understand the process of GST intimation in Form DRC-01A, issued for tax discrepancies. Learn about the parts of DRC-01A, applicab...
Goods and Services Tax : Calcutta High Court stays a GST order, citing no force majeure for time limit extension under Section 73(9) of the CGST Act for FY...
Goods and Services Tax : KSCAA represents to the Finance Minister on the misapplication of GST Section 74 notices for small demands, urging restriction to ...
Goods and Services Tax : KSCAA highlights practical GST challenges in Sec 128A & Sec 16(4), urging clarifications on appeals, ITC, interest waivers, and mu...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that negligence on part of bank in presentation of cheque within the validity period of cheque leads to ‘defi...
Goods and Services Tax : The case clarifies that Section 74 requires clear evidence of fraud or wilful suppression. Mere reliance on third-party alerts wit...
Goods and Services Tax : The Court held that denial of input tax credit cannot be sustained without clear findings that suppliers failed to pay tax. The ma...
Goods and Services Tax : Karnataka High Court held that pigmy agents employed by the Bank can never be treated as business facilitators and qualifies as em...
Income Tax : The Court held that a summary in Form DRC-01 cannot substitute a proper show cause notice under Section 73. Proceedings initiated ...
Goods and Services Tax : New GST circular clarifies payment via GSTR-3B for Section 128A benefits, and appeal withdrawals for mixed period demands....
Goods and Services Tax : Learn about the Kerala SGST Act's interest and penalty waiver under Section 128A, eligibility, application process, and compliance...
Goods and Services Tax : Kerala SGST issues guidelines on issuing separate notices for Sections 73 and 74. Ensures clarity and uniformity in handling GST d...
The Kerala High Court has ruled that Input Tax Credit cannot be denied merely for availing it under a wrong head in the Electronic Credit Ledger, treating it as a unified fund.
Madras High Court held that delay of more than 17 years in adjudication of show cause proceeding without justifiable reasons is arbitrary and offending under Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Thus, proceedings are dropped and writ petition is allowed.
Nickel Hydroxide powder with additives like cobalt and graphite was classifiable as a miscellaneous chemical product under Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 3824 and not as an inorganic chemical under CTH 2825.
The issue involved in the present petition is that the Electronic credit ledger of the petitioner was blocked by the impugned order dated 26.03.2025, by invoking Rule 86A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017.
Allahabad High Court quashes GST demand and appellate orders against Amar Agencies, citing denial of personal hearing and appellate authority’s failure to decide on merits.
Allahabad High Court rules excess stock found during GST search falls under Sections 73/74, not Section 130, quashing orders against Gopal Trading Company.
Orissa High Court held that disallowance of input tax credit under GST without granting proper opportunity to substantiate the claim is not justified. Accordingly, ex-parte order passed is liable to be set aside and matter remanded back.
Calcutta High Court stays a GST order, citing no force majeure for time limit extension under Section 73(9) of the CGST Act for FY 2019-20.
Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand against Fair Deal Cars Pvt. Ltd. due to the lack of a pre-consultation notice (DRC-01A), granting the petitioner a fresh hearing opportunity.
Delhi HC dismissed Jain Bhadri Graphics’ plea against GST demand for fictitious firms & fraudulent ITC, ruling the adjudicating authority had jurisdiction & directing the assessee to appeal.
