Goods and Services Tax : Kerala HC rules that GST orders under Section 73 must have digital or manual signatures to be valid, quashing impugned orders in t...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore Section 61 of CGST Act, covering scrutiny of GST returns, officer's authority, taxpayer obligations, and implications for ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Kerala SGST guidelines address the adjudication of multiple Show Cause Notices, ensuring consistency in decision-making across...
Goods and Services Tax : Learn about GST amnesty provisions for waiving interest, penalties, and regularizing ITC under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. Apply by...
Goods and Services Tax : Learn about GST return scrutiny under Section 61 of the CGST Act, 2017. Understand the process, objectives, and key areas of compl...
Goods and Services Tax : KSCAA highlights practical GST challenges in Sec 128A & Sec 16(4), urging clarifications on appeals, ITC, interest waivers, and mu...
Goods and Services Tax : Gauhati High Court held that the Summary of the Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 is not a substitute to the Show Cause Notice to be...
Goods and Services Tax : The Supreme Court issues notice on a plea challenging GST notifications extending limitation for adjudication under Section 73 of ...
Goods and Services Tax : Calcutta High Court dismissed a plea challenging an SCN under the CGST Act, citing availability of a statutory appeal remedy under...
Goods and Services Tax : Assessee clarified that Form ST-3 was incorrect as some of the invoices inadvertently remained unaccounted for the said period and...
Goods and Services Tax : Gauhati High Court held that issuance of summary of the Show Cause Notice [SCN] doesn’t dispense with requirement of issuance of...
Goods and Services Tax : Kerala SGST issues guidelines on issuing separate notices for Sections 73 and 74. Ensures clarity and uniformity in handling GST d...
Court observed that the petitioner had provided a detailed reply addressing each head of the Show Cause Notice. However, the impugned order merely stated that the reply was not satisfactory without providing any substantive reasoning or analysis. The Court held that this lack of consideration rendered the order unsustainable.
Explore the Delhi High Court’s directive for re-adjudication in Canara Bank’s case against a cryptic order regarding GST demands. Get insights now!
The High Court scrutinized the case, highlighting flaws in the order’s reasoning. It emphasized that the petitioner’s reply was comprehensive and should have been evaluated on its merits. The court found the decision lacking in thoroughness, as the officer failed to seek clarification or additional documents before dismissing the reply as unsatisfactory.
Delhi High Court remits GST demand order due to unsatisfactory reply, directing re-adjudication by Proper Officer, ensuring fair procedure.
Read the full text of the judgment where Bombay High Court quashes an assessment order, citing violation of principles of natural justice and denial of fair personal hearing.
Delhi High Court directs re-adjudication as it finds Assessee’s detailed reply ignored in rejecting ITC claim. Full text of judgment/order provided.
GST Registration cannot be cancelled Retrospectively unless it is intended dent taxpayer’s customers input tax credit availed in respect of the supplies made by tax payer during such period.
Read the detailed analysis of the judgment in Abitha Timber Traders Vs Assistant Commissioner case by Madras High Court. Learn about the implications and conclusions.
Anand Madhavan Nair Indiradevi Vs State Tax Officer (Kerala High Court) Introduction: The Kerala High Court recently ruled on the case of Anand Madhavan Nair Indiradevi vs. State Tax Officer regarding a writ petition challenging an order under the CGST/SGST Act. The court’s decision highlights the limitation of writ petitions in adjudicating disputed facts and […]
Delhi High Court sets aside an order passed under Section 73 of the CGST Act, ruling that the ITC claim rejection lacked proper opportunity for hearing.
