Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : This guide explains when penalties can be imposed under various provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It also outlines the appli...
Income Tax : ITAT held that additions based solely on third-party search material without independent evidence or cross-examination are invalid...
Income Tax : Income without satisfactory explanation is taxed at a special high rate under Section 115BBE. The provisions place strict liabilit...
Income Tax : A doctrinal analysis of unexplained cash credits, investments, and expenditure under Sections 68–69D. Explains burden of proof a...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deleted a Section 69 addition after finding documentary evidence established joint ownership, source of funds, and ear...
Income Tax : ITAT held that a registered sale deed without corroborative evidence is not incriminating material and cannot support additions in...
Income Tax : ITAT held that multiplying a seized figure without supporting evidence was unjustified and restricted the Section 69 addition to t...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that proceedings initiated under the old Section 153C framework after the Finance Act, 2021 amendments were leg...
Income Tax : Tribunal held that omission to mention the exact charging provision did not vitiate the assessment where unexplained cash and bull...
ITAT Hyderabad remands tax assessment case due to taxpayer’s unawareness of faceless proceedings, imposes penalty for non-compliance.
ITAT Delhi deletes Rs 33.9L Sec 69 addition for Ankur Goyal (AY 12-13) citing mother’s accepted assessment. Remands Sec 24 interest issue for verification.
ITAT Mumbai overturns Rs. 33 lakh addition under Section 69 in Aarti Sudarshan Soni vs. ITO, citing lack of evidence for alleged on-money property payment.
ITAT Raipur held that entire addition of transaction in the hands of assessee under section 69 of the Income Tax Act as unexplained investment not tenable since the same needs to be allocated between joint beneficial owners. Thus, matter restore back to file of AO.
ITAT Jaipur held that invocation of revisionary proceedings u/s. 263 of the Income Tax Act not sustainable since AO duly verified investment and payment of ESI/PF.
ITAT Pune rules no addition under Section 69 if investment source is disclosed in the balance sheet. Partial relief granted for unexplained cash deposits.
ITAT Delhi overturns tax addition in Puja Gupta Vs ITO, ruling that share transactions were genuine. Revenue’s reliance on suspicion and probabilities dismissed.
ITAT Ahmedabad dismisses Revenue’s appeal, ruling notice u/s 148 issued beyond the stipulated period u/s 149(1)(a) in ITO Vs Nishan Govindbhai Thakkar.
M/s. GRR Holdings is a firm was incorporated on 31.01.2014 with two partners Shri Gaddam Shyam Prasad Reddy & Shri Syed Fayaz Mohammed. The main objective of the partnership firm is to carry on real estate business.
No goods had been sold, and forged bills were prepared. Furthermore, no vehicles had passed through toll plazas, and no registration numbers were available. On appeal.
