Income Tax : Learn about unexplained cash credits under Section 68, tax implications, key legal cases, and compliance requirements to avoid pen...
Income Tax : Understand the applicability of Section 68 (cash credit) and Section 69 (unexplained investments) under the Income Tax Act with re...
Income Tax : The Sections by which the assessees are suffering too much due to high pitched assessments passed by NFAC are from 68 to 69D and 1...
Income Tax : Recent Chennai ITAT decisions address unexplained income, underreporting, and penalties under Sections 69A, 68, 270A, and 271. Key...
Income Tax : Learn about penalty provisions under the IT Act, including penalties for defaults in tax payment, income reporting, and more. Key ...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore reverses addition of ₹12 lakh under Section 68, accepting sales as the source of cash deposits made during demone...
Income Tax : ITAT Raipur held that penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act justifiable since no plausible explanation provided fo...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that when the sale consideration as per conveyance deed and circle rates are different, matter must be referred to...
Income Tax : ITAT Jaipur held that addition of the amount already recorded as cash sales cannot be treated as unexplained cash deposits under s...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition, treating share application money as unexplained income, based on surmises and conjectures witho...
Income Tax : Assessing Officers should follow the sequence as noted below for applying provisions of section 68 of the Act: Step 1: Whether the...
ITAT Mumbai held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act towards unexplained cash credit sustained as identity and creditworthiness of the parties and genuineness of the transaction not proved.
ITAT Amritsar in Abdul Hamid Khan Vs ITO, deleted an ex parte addition made during the COVID-19 pandemic under Section 68 of Income Tax Act
CESTAT Delhi held that unless payment has been made for an independent activity of tolerating an act under an independent arrangement entered into for such activity or tolerating an act, such payment will not constitute ‘consideration’ and such activities will not constitute ‘supply’.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition on account of deemed dividend as per section 2(22)(e) of the Act unsustainable in the hands of non-shareholders.
Delhi High Court held that the award can be regarded as enforceable only if it is actually executable. Accordingly, the Final Partial Award passed by the Arbitral Tribunal is unenforceable award.
Assessees must thoroughly discharge initial onus under section 68. Until assessee does so, AO is under no obligation to conduct further inquiries.
ITAT Hyderabad held that assessee neither before AO nor before CIT(A) could produce any evidence to support his astronomical agricultural income. Accordingly, in absence of evidence, addition sustained.
ITAT Hyderabad held that CIT(A) wrongly deleted the addition as nature of entries found in the cash book which were not recorded in the day book was not considered.
ITAT Cuttack held that claim of exemption of long term capital gains (LTCG), from sale of equity shares, under section 10(38) of Income Tax Act, 1961 allowable as requisite conditions satisfied.
ITAT Delhi held that assessment order based on notice issued under section 148 not by the jurisdictional AO is unsustainable and liable to be quashed.
