Income Tax : Learn about unexplained cash credits under Section 68, tax implications, key legal cases, and compliance requirements to avoid pen...
Income Tax : Understand the applicability of Section 68 (cash credit) and Section 69 (unexplained investments) under the Income Tax Act with re...
Income Tax : The Sections by which the assessees are suffering too much due to high pitched assessments passed by NFAC are from 68 to 69D and 1...
Income Tax : Recent Chennai ITAT decisions address unexplained income, underreporting, and penalties under Sections 69A, 68, 270A, and 271. Key...
Income Tax : Learn about penalty provisions under the IT Act, including penalties for defaults in tax payment, income reporting, and more. Key ...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore reverses addition of ₹12 lakh under Section 68, accepting sales as the source of cash deposits made during demone...
Income Tax : ITAT Raipur held that penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act justifiable since no plausible explanation provided fo...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that when the sale consideration as per conveyance deed and circle rates are different, matter must be referred to...
Income Tax : ITAT Jaipur held that addition of the amount already recorded as cash sales cannot be treated as unexplained cash deposits under s...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition, treating share application money as unexplained income, based on surmises and conjectures witho...
Income Tax : Assessing Officers should follow the sequence as noted below for applying provisions of section 68 of the Act: Step 1: Whether the...
ITAT Surat held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act towards unexplained cash credit unjustified as creditworthiness of the loan giver established and transaction undertaken through banking channel.
Explore the CESTAT Ahmedabad verdict on Dhariwal Industries Ltd. vs. C.C.E. & C. – Anand, clarifying service tax liability on GTA services and cenvat credit entitlement.
Delhi High Court’s decision in PCIT Vs Avdesh Mishra for AY 2016-17: Assessing Officer’s addition for an unsecured loan duly substantiated by the assessee was deleted.
ITAT Delhi held that initiation of reassessment proceedings u/s. 147 of the Income Tax Act by AO based on incorrect facts and without any verification, examination and evaluation of report of Investigation Wing and other material is invalid and unsustainable in law.
ITAT Raipur held that ad-hoc disallowance of expenditure without specifying expenditure which was either not incurred for the purpose of business or was not substantiated by documentary evidence/material is unsustainable in law.
ITAT Delhi held that addition towards unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Income Tax Act unjustified as necessary details explaining the source of credit entries duly provided.
ITAT Delhi held that disallowance of foreign travel expenditure justified as assessee failed to prove the business expediency of foreign trip and therefore assessee failed to discharge the primary onus.
Allahabad High Court held that imposition of penalty under section 129(3) of the UPGST untenable as no observation has been made with regard to intent to evade payment of tax.
Karnataka High Court upholds the ITAT’s decision to delete additions made by Revenue concerning undisclosed income from investments in shell companies.
Allahabad High Court held that argument regarding no intention to avoid payment of tax not whispered in the writ petition. Hence, held that the petitioner cannot be permitted to argue the case without there being any pleading in support of his arguments.
