Goods and Services Tax : Explore the contested issue of time-barred GST appeals. While some courts deny interference, a recent Calcutta High Court ruling c...
Income Tax : The Income-tax Act has prescribed time limit in respect of various procedures, applications, etc. (like time limit for filing an a...
Income Tax : Profits and Gains of Business or Profession (PGBP) Additions and Deductions Following things should be added to ‘Net Profit as p...
Income Tax : Provisions of section 35 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 covers deduction allowable towards expenditure on scientific research. The pr...
Income Tax : The Finance Act 2020 has brought in some dynamic changes in respect of the exempted Trusts, Societies, NGOs, Charitable Trusts, Se...
Corporate Law : Explore the proposed amendments to Regulations 35, 37, and 50 of the Competition Commission of India (General) Regulations 2009. L...
Income Tax : Deferrement of Procedure for Approval/ Registration/Notifications of certain entities U/s 10(23C), 12AA, 35 & 80G of Incom...
Income Tax : A plain reading of Section 35(2AB) of the Act may suggest that the weighted deduction is not with respect to expenditure on scient...
Income Tax : Section 35 of the Income-tax Act provides for deduction in respect of expenditure on research and development. The existing provis...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court held that Banks/ Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs) are obliged to adopt restructuring process of MSME as conte...
Income Tax : Karnataka HC ruled that pending income tax dues against borrowers don't prevent property registration for auction purchases. Learn...
Corporate Law : Delhi HC rules on Sundaresh Bhat vs IBBI, emphasizing ethical conduct and fairness for liquidators under IBC. Key insights into th...
Income Tax : Assessee can't be obstructed from availing of the benefits of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 (DTVSV Act) even where the...
Service Tax : Analysis of Allahabad High Court judgment on limitation period prescribed in special statutes versus the Limitation Act....
Corporate Law : Discover the implications as the provisions of sections 20, 35, and 40 of the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2023 take effect from M...
Income Tax : CBDT has decided that the implementation of new procedure for approval/ registration/notification of certain entities shall be def...
Fema / RBI : UBD.BPD (PCB).Cir No.25/09.11.200/2009-10 Dated - December 3, 2009 The Government had in exercise of powers conferred by Section 3...
Income Tax : Notification No. 64/2009 - Income Tax It is hereby notified for general information that the organization P.S.G. & Sons Charities...
Income Tax : Notification No. 63/2009 - Income Tax It is hereby notified for general information that the organization Centre for Development o...
Allahabad High Court held that both the goods i.e. ‘Bakery Shortening’ and ‘Vanaspati (hydrogenated vegetable oil)’ are being treated as one under Central Excise Tariff Act as well as Customs Tariff Act. Hence, both are to be treated as same even under Sales Tax Law.
Himachal Pradesh High Court held that the Bank has first charge over the properties being secured creditor in priority over all Other Debts, Revenues, Taxes, Cesses and Other Rates payable to the Central or State Government or Legal Authority.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that assessee is entitled to claim weighted deduction on all expenditure incurred by it, on in-house research & development facility. Accordingly, restricting claim of weighted deduction u/s 35(2AB) to the extent approved by the prescribed authority i.e. DSIR unjustified.
ITAT Mumbai held that the benefit under section 35(2AB) of the Income Tax Act is also available in respect of expenditure on clinical trials outside the approved in-house R&D facility.
ITAT Mumbai held that the amount of internal transfer between two EOUs of the assessee is to be considered for the purpose of arriving at the profit eligible for exemption under section 10B of the Income Tax Act.
Supreme Court of India held that disqualification under section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is without any substance as the related party had ceased to be in the helm of affairs of the corporate debtor more than a decade ago.
In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble High Court have given observations on the issue of unstamped arbitration agreement. It has been held that an arbitration agreement, which is unstamped, does not exist and an unstamped contract, containing an arbitration agreement, would not exist as it has no existence in law and it has been observed that such agreement would be impounded under Section 33 of the Stamp Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that in terms of General Clauses Act, 1897 period of six month mentioned in Section 54EC of the Income Tax Act has to be regarded as six British Calendar months.
Bombay High Court held that reopening of assessment u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act unsustainable as the assessee has fully and truly disclosed all the material facts.
CESTAT held that number of appeals should correspond with number of distinct decisions or orders, not number of order numbers in an original order. Essentially, if a single order-in-original has multiple numbers, it doesn’t necessitate multiple appeals.
