#section 271(1)(c)
Log in to FollowLatest section 271(1)(c) updates, provisions, case laws, compliance requirements, tax implications and expert analysis under Income-tax law on TaxGuru.

ITAT Quashes Penalty for Vague Notice Lacking Specific Grounds

CIT’s Section 263 Jurisdiction on AO’s Failure to Initiate Penalty justified

Loss or low profit cannot be reason for exclusion of comparables for computing ALP: ITAT Mumbai

AO Cannot Reopen Assessment to Correct Oversight: Bombay HC

No Section 271(1)(c) Penalty for Stamp Authority Valuation Discrepancy: ITAT Ahmedabad

No 271(1)(c) Penalty Without Willful Concealment or Furnishing Inaccurate Details

ITAT Ahmedabad Deletes Penalty for Income Escapement on income disclosed voluntarily

No Penalty for Excessive Depreciation Claim Due to bona fide Mistake

One Section 153C satisfaction note Sufficient if AO for Both Searched & Other Person is Same

Bogus Purchase: No Penalty for Estimate-Based Additions

No Penalty on Estimated Addition for Bogus Purchases: ITAT Mumbai

Section 54F exemption disallowance cannot lead to imposition of penalty

Section 271(1)(c) Penalty not imposable on Estimated Bogus Purchase Addition

ITAT deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty s Notice Issued without specifying limb
Explore the latest section 271(1)(c) updates on TaxGuru, including relevant Income-tax Act provisions, rules, notifications, circulars, judicial decisions and compliance guidance. The coverage highlights important tax positions, procedural requirements, assessments, deductions, penalties and litigation developments to help taxpayers and professionals understand the practical implications of changes in income-tax law.
