#section 271(1)(c)
Log in to FollowLatest section 271(1)(c) updates, provisions, case laws, compliance requirements, tax implications and expert analysis under Income-tax law on TaxGuru.

No penalty u/s 271(1)(c) as ALP recomputed by TPO was invalid as assesee followed prescribed method (TNMM) u/s 92C

No Section 271(1)(c) Penalty for Section 54F exemption claim with conflicting views

ITAT Pune Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty Against Assessee Over Defective Notice

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Sustainable for Bona Fide 54F Claim Delayed by Builder Default: ITAT Delhi

No Penalty for Disallowed Advances & Interest Claims: ITAT Bangalore

Addition u/s. 68 set aside as source of credits disclosed: ITAT Mumbai

License fee for broadcasting sports event apportioned as 10% towards recorded events and 90% towards live coverage

Till March 2013 section 68 not require explanation of source of credit: ITAT Mumbai

Assessee proves identity & creditworthiness of lender: Upholds deletion of Addition

Jurisdiction of JAO to conduct proceedings u/s. 148A: Matter referred to Larger Bench

Section 40A(3) cannot be invoked as income estimated based on gross profit rate

Addition merely based on difference in Form 26AS and sales disclosed in P&L not sustainable

ITAT Delhi Quashes ₹40.94 Crore Penalties for Non-Compliance Under Sec. 271(1)(c)

ITAT Surat Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty on Estimated Income Addition
Explore the latest section 271(1)(c) updates on TaxGuru, including relevant Income-tax Act provisions, rules, notifications, circulars, judicial decisions and compliance guidance. The coverage highlights important tax positions, procedural requirements, assessments, deductions, penalties and litigation developments to help taxpayers and professionals understand the practical implications of changes in income-tax law.
