Income Tax : Judicial rulings clarify that satisfaction for initiating action against other persons in search cases must be recorded promptly. ...
Income Tax : Courts are divided on whether the DRP-specific deadline under Section 144C(13) overrides the general assessment time bar in Sectio...
Income Tax : CBDT issues new compounding guidelines simplifying process, eligibility, charges, and procedures under the Income-tax Act from Oct...
Income Tax : A summary of prosecution offences under Chapter XXII of the Income Tax Act (Sections 275A to 280), detailing the rigorous imprison...
Income Tax : CBDT's new Compounding of Offence Guidelines (2024) simplify the process but maintain strict compliance rules. Learn about eligibi...
Income Tax : Learn about the new block assessment provisions for cases involving searches under section 132 and requisitions under section 132A...
Income Tax : The case examined whether compensation paid to exit prior agreements was a sham arrangement. The Tribunal ruled it was a valid bus...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that loan repayment cannot be treated as unexplained cash credit under section 68. The addition was deleted as i...
Income Tax : The issue was whether a notice granting less than the statutory minimum time is valid. The tribunal held that giving less than 7 d...
Income Tax : Reassessment proceedings was invalid for a notice issued beyond three years without the sanction of the prescribed higher authorit...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that unsigned excel sheets without supporting evidence cannot justify additions. It ruled that absence of corrob...
Income Tax : Availability of Miscellaneous Functionalities related to ‘Selection of Case of Search Year’ and ‘Relevant Search...
AGM Properties P. Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) To recapitulate the facts, it is an admitted position that for AY 2013-14 the assessee had originally filed its return of income under section 139(1) of the Act on 15.11.2014 and assessment under section 143(1) of the Act was completed on 15.11.2013. The time limit for issuance […]
Held that in the present case the approving authority has acted casually and granted the approval u/s. 153D in a mechanical manner without judicious exercise of power. According, approval granted u/s 153D was quashed and consequently the assessment order u/s 153A was also quashed.
Sanjeevkumar S/o Biharilal Kabra Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court) 1. The matter is placed on board for speaking to minutes in respect of order dated 22.04.2022 passed by this Court. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks clarification of the order, more particularly in so far as directions issued in paragraph no.43 […]
Short term capital loss not claimed while filing return u/s 139(1). Loss was claimed for the first time via return u/s 153A. Claim denied according to provisions of section 80.
ACIT Vs Rameshbhai Jivrajbhai Desai (ITAT Ahmedabad) During the course of assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. The Ld. AR submitted that the assessment order passed under Section 153A of the Act was held to be void ab initio and thus there is no addition in the […]
Vivimed Labs Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad) hon’ble apex court’s landmark decision in CIT Vs. Sinhaghad Technical Educational Society (2017) 84 com 290 (SC) that no such proceedings initiated u/s 153A of the Act sustainable in law for want of incriminating material found or seized during the course of search. We make it clear that […]
DCIT Vs Apple Metal Industries Pvt Ltd (ITAT Delhi) Assessment for Assessment Year 2011-12 was completed after making addition on account of unverified share application money amounting to Rs. 8,70,71,936/- and in Assessment Year 2014-15, addition on account of unverified share capital amounting to Rs. 30,00,600/- was made. The impugned assessment order clearly shows that […]
Section 278 (e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, empowers the Court to presume culpable mental state of the accused, unless, the accused shows that he had no such mental state with respect to the act charged as an offence in the prosecution.
PCIT Vs LKG Builders P. Ltd. (Delhi High Court) Court is of the opinion that the questions of law raised in present appeals have been settled by earlier Division Bench in CIT Vs. Kabul Chawla (supra) and assessment of the respondents had attained finality prior to the date of search and no incriminating documents or […]
Since no incriminating material was found during the course of search, as regards the additions made u/s.68 of the Income Tax Act, therefore, no additions could be made.
