Income Tax : Understand Section 194S of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Learn about TDS on transfer of virtual digital assets (VDA), thresholds, tax ...
Corporate Law : In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court clarified that an overt act by unlawful assembly members suffices for murder charges under...
Income Tax : Delve into the provisions of Income Tax Act Sections 153A & 153C, governing assessments after search or requisition. Learn from co...
Income Tax : Explore the intricacies of the time limits for issuing notices under Section 149 of the Income Tax Department with this article. F...
Income Tax : Reading a decision is one thing and interpreting the same is another, isn’t it? Many times, verdict of the decisions written its...
Income Tax : Read the detailed analysis of Karrm Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. CIT at ITAT Mumbai. Learn why ITAT ruled that non-filing of GST b...
Income Tax : Delhi High Court rules that reassessment actions post-2021 searches must meet the First Proviso to Section 149(1) of the Income Ta...
Income Tax : Bombay High Court deems CBDT's refusal to condone delay in filing revised ITR by CG Power post-NCLT order unreasonable. Detailed a...
Custom Duty : Madras High Court directs Customs to dispose of Aditya International Ltd's request for CVD exemption amendment on silk imports wit...
Custom Duty : Once a export benefit under which shipping bill was filed has been availed, the conversion to any other scheme cannot be allowed a...
Custom Duty : Learn how to file and process Bill of Entry amendments at Jawahar Lal Nehru Custom House. Get insights on self-approval and office...
Dilipkumar Premji Chheda Vs ITO (Bombay High Court) 1. Issue notice. Mr. Ajeet Manwani, learned counsel waives service for the Respondents. Objections be filed in six weeks. 2. Learned counsel for Petitioner states that the impugned notice dated 7th April, 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Act is unsustainable in law and in as […]
Reading a decision is one thing and interpreting the same is another, isn’t it? Many times, verdict of the decisions written itself per se do not give the correct meaning until the same is read in a proper context or perspective with the facts of each case.
Learn about the major defense available to the assessee under section 149 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Understand how income represented as an asset can benefit taxpayers.
DCIT Vs Dilip J Thakkar (ITAT Mumbai) Section 149(1)(c) provides that no notice for reassessment can be issued if “more than sixteen years, have elapsed from the end of the relevant assessment year unless the income in relation to any asset (including financial interest in any entity) located outside India, chargeable to tax, has escaped […]
Section 149 is modified by Finance Act 2021 and now any case can be reopened within three years from the end of relevant assessment year as per clause (a) of Section 149(1) if Assessing Officer has information which suggests that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment as prescribed in Explanation 1 to Section 148 […]
Tata Communications Transformation Services Limited Vs ACIT (Bombay High Court) 1. Mr. Jehangir Mistri, learned Senior Advocate appearing for petitioner vehemently contends that the impugned notice under section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 in the present matter issued on 21/05/2021 is absolutely untenable on various grounds. He submits several provisions of the Income Tax […]
Time limit to issue notice- One of the major differences between the new and old regime is the time limit of issue of notice, under the earlier regime the time limit for issue of notice was 4 years from the end of the relevant assessment year however in certain circumstances it was 6 and 16 years.
