Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held that disallowance of agricultural expenses based on estimation is unsustainable without concrete evidence, rul...
Income Tax : Understand the implications of receiving a notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. Learn how to respond, time limits, a...
Income Tax : Article discusses about Order which can be rectified under section 154 of Income Tax Act, 1961, Rectification of Income Tax order ...
Income Tax : Explore the implications of taxation under section 115BBE, including misuse of sections 68 to 69D, consequences of high tax rates,...
Income Tax : Every taxpayer has to furnish the details of his income to the Income-tax Department. These details are to be furnished by filing ...
Income Tax : It has been observed that in many cases an assessee may wish to make a claim which was not made in the return of income filed unde...
Income Tax : We have attached a file in excel format. The file contains the format of various details which normally assessing officer asks As...
Income Tax : Karnataka High Court held that settlement commission, accepting additional income offered as reasonable and giving immunity from p...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune restored the assessment order as assessee neither filed any evidence nor provided material in an attempt to discharge th...
Income Tax : Rajasthan HC upholds penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for unexplained cash deposits after withdrawals. ...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that the condition of make available was not satisfied for services when provided by assessee did not enabled the ...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune directed addition u/s. 68 of the Income Tax Act towards unsecured loans as appellate deliberately withhold information f...
Income Tax : Instruction No.1/2015 Clarification regarding applicability of section 143(1D) of the Income-tax Act, 1961- Vide Finance Act, 2012...
In DCIT vs. CDS Infra Projects Limited, ITAT Delhi ruled no addition under section 68 of Income Tax Act if proper evidence for source of share capital subscription is submitted.
Analysis of ITAT Delhi’s ruling in DCIT vs. Sandeep Hooda clarifies conditions for Income Tax Act 1961 Section 54 deduction eligibility in absence of basic amenities.
Assessee had miserably failed to establish genuineness of the transaction by cogent and credible evidence and that the investments made in its share capital were genuine.
Read the full text of the order from ITAT Chennai dismissing the appeal due to unexplained 726-day delay. Detailed analysis and implications provided.
Read the detailed analysis of Union Bank of India’s case vs ITO where ITAT Chennai grants deduction under Section 80P for dividends from cooperative bank shares.
In ITO Vs Saivi Finance Pvt Ltd, ITAT Delhi restores the matter back to AO due to denial of natural justice, assessees not given chance to cross-examine persons whose statements were used against them.
Discover the conditions for issuance of a reassessment notice u/s 153A beyond six years & explore the detailed analysis of ACIT Vs Goldstone Cements Ltd. (ITAT Kolkata) case.
Detailed analysis of ITAT Delhi order in Instrumentation Laboratory India Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT, addressing assessment order dispatch after the limitation period, leading to partial allowance of appeal.
Bombay High Court ruling favors Tata Steel, allowing its Rs. 212.52 crores contribution to Compensatory Afforestation Fund as revenue expenditure, dismissing IT department’s appeal.
Explore the ITAT Delhi ruling on deletion of additions based on manual cash books in Section 153A assessments.
