Income Tax : Comparison between section 68, section 69, section 69A, section 69B and section 69C: -So far as section 68 is concerned, the onus ...
Income Tax : SET OFF OF LOSS FROM ONE SOURCE AGAINST INCOME FROM ANOTHER SOURCE UNDER THE SAME HEAD OF INCOME (INTER SOURCE). SET OFF OF LOSS ...
Income Tax : M/s NRB Bearing Ltd vs. Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax (ITAT Mumbai) Municipal rateable value cannot be rejected straightway.To ...
Income Tax : The assessee, a Branch of Canara Bank, made interest payment of Rs.201,000,000/- to New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (he...
Income Tax : Food world Supermarkets Ltd. vs.DCIT- ITAT Bangalore observed that the 5 seconded employees were not ordinary employees or workers...
Income Tax : Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. vs. ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT observed that the assessee has acquired the service agreement whereby ...
Income Tax : Appeal filed by Assessee - The Assessee is a company incorporated under the provisions of Companies Act, 1956 and is engaged in ru...
ITAT Delhi has held in the case of ITO, TDS vs. Nokia India Pvt. Ltd that services rendered does not qualify as FTS for technical services under the India Finland Tax Treaty if service provider has not made available to assessee any technical knowledge skill
ITAT Mumbai held in case of ACIT vs. Suryashankar Properties Limited that Intention of letting out the property is to be seen for invoking clause (c) of section 23(1) for computing the annual letting value of the property and it is irrelevant whether the property is/was let out.
TechNVision Ventures Ltd. Vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Merely because the assessee had claimed the expenditure, where claim was not accepted or was not acceptable to the revenue, that by itself would not, attract the penalty under Section 271(1)(c).
Delhi High Court has held in the case of DIT vs. M/s Lufthansa Cargo India that Retrospective amendments seeking to tax income of non-residents does not affect the source rule’. The amendment makes no any difference to the non-taxability of payments made to foreign companies if the income accrues abroad – Section 9.
ITAT Mumbai has held in the case of ACIT vs. Tristar Jewellery Exports Pvt. Ltd. That Reliance on statement of supplier who confesses to providing accommodation entries without giving assessee right of cross-examination violates principles of natural justice.
The Court relied on the agreement concluded between Assessee and M/s Lakeshore according to which M/s Lakeshore would run Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal surgery, Urology, Nephrology and Anesthesiology departments of the assessee upon receipt of payments as per the agreement which was not the case of undertaking a contract work.
The charges such as Landing Charges, Lighting Charges, Approach and Aerodrome Control Charges, Aircraft Parking Charges, Aerobridge Charges, Hangar Charges, Passenger Service Charges, Cargo Charges etc.
CIT vs. Sarkar Builders (Supreme Court of India)- Restriction on extent of commercial area in ‘housing project’ imposed w.e.f. 1.4.2005 does not apply to housing projects approved before 1.4.2005 even though completed after 1.4.2005 – Section 80-IB(10).
The appellant-assessee is engaged in the business of export of marine products and also financial consultancy and trading in equity shares. Its total business does not consist purely of exports but includes business within the country as well which situation is covered by Section 80HHC (3)(b).
SET OFF OF LOSS FROM ONE SOURCE AGAINST INCOME FROM ANOTHER SOURCE UNDER THE SAME HEAD OF INCOME (INTER SOURCE). SET OFF OF LOSS FROM ONE HEAD AGAINST THE INCOME FROM ANOTHER (INTER HEAD)
