Goods and Services Tax : Explore the constitutional validity of Anti-Profiteering provisions under GST, their impact on businesses and consumers, and the l...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the sunset of the National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST and its logical end. Learn about its functions, mer...
Goods and Services Tax : Reason 1: Anti-profiteering provisions are Ultra vires of Article 246A of the Constitution Reason 2: Constitution of NAA is contra...
Goods and Services Tax : The Hon’ble National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA), in the case of DGAP vs. Hardcastle Restaurants [Case No. 79/2020 dated D...
Goods and Services Tax : D.S. Brothers Vs Durga Marketing Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) GST Profiteering of Rs. 1,57,200 established in the case of supply of Duracell Ba...
Goods and Services Tax : Leading consumer and public policy research and advocacy group, CUTS International has requested the Finance Minister, Ms Nirmala ...
Goods and Services Tax : Empanelment of Advocates / Law Firms for representing the National Anti-profiteering Authority and Director General of Anti-Profit...
Goods and Services Tax : The tenure of National Anti-Profiteering Authority has been extended by 2 years. The Council also decided to introduce electronic ...
Goods and Services Tax : Anti-Profiteering Measures The National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) was constituted on 28th November, 2017 under Section 17...
Goods and Services Tax : The National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) has been constituted under Section 171 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2...
Goods and Services Tax : Analysis of the Principal Commissioner vs Ranga 70 MM case, involving anti-profiteering issues in GST reduction for cinema ticket ...
Goods and Services Tax : Telangana HC upheld Sudarshan Theatre's violation of CGST Section 171 for delayed ticket price reduction after GST rate cut, dismi...
Goods and Services Tax : The CCI investigated Baxium Health Science for failing to pass on GST reductions. Detailed findings highlight discrepancies in pro...
Goods and Services Tax : CCI examines whether Nirma Ltd. complied with GST tax rate reductions, addressing the legal and economic implications of alleged a...
Goods and Services Tax : CCI finds no profiteering by Swastik Harmony Developers in Jainil Mehta GST complaint. Case dropped due to lack of evidence under ...
Goods and Services Tax : Central Goods and Services Tax (Fourth Amendment) Rules, 2022 – CBIC omitted following GST Rules 122,124,125,134 and 137 vi...
Goods and Services Tax : CBIC notifies Competition Commission of India to examine whether input tax credits availed by any registered person or the reducti...
Goods and Services Tax : I have been further directed to request you to take all possible steps envisaged under the GST Laws to ensure that the legislative...
Goods and Services Tax : Field formations shall henceforth, also defend the cases on behalf of National Anti‑profiteering Authority (GST), New Delhi pend...
Parveen Kumar Bansal Vs Sternal Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) We have carefully considered the Report furnished by the DGAP, the submissions made by the Respondent and the other material placed on record. On examining the various submissions, the observations of this Authority are as follows:- a) The DGAP, in Para 16 of his report, has […]
Prabhat Kumar Vs Mascot Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) NAA held that apparent anomalies in the Reports of the DGAP need to be appropriately addressed by way of revisiting the investigation in the interest of justice. Since there are differences in the figures considered for computation of the profiteering amount, thorough verification of the figures is […]
National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) directed the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) to investigate the profiteering charges against 14 projects of BPTP Ltd and furnish his Report under Rule 129 (6) of the CGST Rules, 2017. The investigation should be carried out w.e.f. July 1, 2017 to November 31, 2020 or till the date OC had been received by BPTP in respect of the Project.
Application filed by Applicant No. 1 alleging profiteering by the Respondent in respect of the supply of Services by way of admission to exhibition of cinematograph films where the price of admission ticket is above one hundred rupees despite a reduction in the rate of GST from 28% to 18% w.e.f. 01.01.2019.
M. Srinivas Vs Electronics Mart India Ltd. (NAA) The brief facts of the case are that an application dated 29.03.2019 was filed by the Applicant No. 1, under Rule 128 (1) of the CGST Rules, 2017 before the Standing Committee on Anti-Profiteering alleging profiteering by the Respondent in respect of supply of Monitors and TVs […]
Director General of Anti-Profiteering Vs Procter & Gamble Home Products (PGHP) Private Limited (NAA) The brief facts of the case were that the Applicant had alleged that the Respondents had not passed on the benefit of reduction in the rate of GST from 28% to 18% w.e.f. 15.11.2017 to the recipients by way of commensurate […]
Director-General of Anti-Profiteering Vs Dange Enterprises (National Anti-Profiteering Authority) We observe that as an investigating agency, the DGAP has been conferred with wide-ranging powers under Rules 129 and 132 of the CGST Rules read with Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 to summon any relevant record which may be required for conducting an investigation […]
Saurabh Kumar Vs Pareena Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (NAA) 1. The present Report dated 25.03.2020 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director-General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that vide […]
Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti Profiteering Vs TTK Prestige Ltd. (NAA) Since, no penalty provisions were in existence between the period w.e.f. 01.11.2017 to 31.08.2018 when the Respondent had violated the provisions of Section 171 (1), the penalty prescribed under Section 171 (3A) cannot be imposed on the Respondent retrospectively. Accordingly, the notice dated […]
Kumudchandra Atmaram Patel Vs TTK Prestige Ltd. (NAA) vide Section 112 of the Finance Act, 2019 specific penalty provisions have been added for violation of the provisions of Section 171 (1) which have come in to force w.e.f. 01.01.2020, by inserting Section 171 (3A). Since, no penalty provisions were in existence between the period w.e.f. […]
