ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : Discover the implications of a significant Delhi ITAT ruling on cash sales pre-demonetization. Learn how it affects taxation and f...
Income Tax : ITAT upholds penalty against taxpayer for cash repayment of loans, contravening Section 269T of Income-tax Act. Explore implicatio...
Income Tax : In a landmark ruling, ITAT Mumbai grants Vodafone the right to claim depreciation on goodwill, clarifying that amendments by Finan...
Income Tax : Explore the latest in international taxation: from judicial precedents to regulatory changes. Dive into cases, form updates, and M...
Income Tax : Explore recent ITAT judgment in Rakesh Kr. Jha vs. ITO, delving into interpretation of Sections 271A and 271B, highlighting confli...
Income Tax : Learn about hybrid hearing guidelines of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Indore Bench, effective from October 9, 2023, offeri...
Income Tax : Supreme Court of India has recently issued an order requiring all revenue appeals before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ...
Income Tax : At present appeals are fixed in routine and may take one to two years period even for first hearing. it is humbly submitted that t...
Income Tax : CBI Registers a Case against Accountant Member, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) on the Allegations of Possessing Disproportio...
Income Tax : Law Minister Shri Ravi Shankar Prasad launches 'itat e-dwar', an e-filing portal of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Portal will ena...
Income Tax : In the case of Mewar Hospital Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Jodhpur), Bench ruled no addition for explained demonetization currency depo...
Income Tax : Dhanpat Raj Khatri Vs ITO (ITAT Jodhpur) If the explanation based on accounts supported by affidavit is not controverted, no addit...
Income Tax : ITAT Jaipur quashes PCIT order in Yesh Dagas case, citing violation of natural justice principles. Key points of the judgment and ...
Income Tax : ITAT Raipur order on Rajesh Kumar Tiwari vs ITO. ITAT sets aside Income Tax reassessment completed without providing fair & reason...
Income Tax : Read the detailed analysis of Karrm Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. CIT at ITAT Mumbai. Learn why ITAT ruled that non-filing of GST b...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
Income Tax : Office Order No. 08 of 2021 Post facto approval of the Competent Authority is hereby conveyed for extension of term of ad-hoc appo...
Income Tax : In continuation of the SOP (Standard Operating Procedure) dated 01.06.2020 the hearing of cases at 'ITAT Chandigarh Benches from 0...
Detailed analysis of ITAT’s decision to delete the Section 69C addition for capital introduced by a partner in the Shivam Developers vs DCIT case at Ahmedabad.
ITAT Hyderabad remands Jonna Iron Mart Vs ACIT case regarding Section 41(1) addition due to lack of discussion on Sundry Creditors difference by Income Tax Authorities.
Delhi ITAT ruling favors G-Tekt India Pvt. Ltd., allowing deduction for CENVAT Credit written off. Detailed analysis of the case and implications.
Explore the ITAT Mumbai’s ruling on Section 249(4)(b) in Income Tax Reassessment Proceedings. Detailed analysis of Nine Globe Industries Pvt. Ltd Vs ACIT case.
Chandigarh ITAT rules that mere difference of opinion with AO is insufficient for exercising revisionary power under Section 263, confirming Sec 80P deduction.
Learn about the Kolkata ITAT ruling on compensatory vs. penal nature of environmental compensation payments in Majhaulia Sugar Industries Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO case.
In Ambience Pvt Ltd vs ITO (ITAT Delhi), the issue of TDS penalty under sec 271C is discussed. Analysis reveals why penalty wasn’t justified due to a bonafide belief.
Kolkata ITAT rules in favor of Dream Valley Barter Pvt. Ltd., stating no addition under Section 68 for share premium if taxpayer proves identity and creditworthiness.
Kolkata ITAT justifies addition u/s 68 in ITO Vs Mangalvani Commercial Pvt. Ltd. for unexplained share capital & premium. Detailed analysis of the case provided.
In a case before ITAT Delhi, it was ruled that payment made overseas for tariff information does not constitute ‘FTS’, hence no TDS deduction under section 195 is warranted.
