ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held that disallowance of agricultural expenses based on estimation is unsustainable without concrete evidence, rul...
Income Tax : ITAT ruled that exemption under Section 54F cannot be denied solely due to missing bills or vouchers, emphasizing the principle of...
Income Tax : Learn about how the holding period of property impacts Capital Gain tax, including ITAT's recent decision clarifying calculations ...
Income Tax : Explore key updates on recent income tax case laws, covering international taxation, business income, and capital gains. Essential...
Income Tax : Discover the implications of a significant Delhi ITAT ruling on cash sales pre-demonetization. Learn how it affects taxation and f...
Income Tax : Learn about hybrid hearing guidelines of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Indore Bench, effective from October 9, 2023, offeri...
Income Tax : Supreme Court of India has recently issued an order requiring all revenue appeals before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ...
Income Tax : At present appeals are fixed in routine and may take one to two years period even for first hearing. it is humbly submitted that t...
Income Tax : CBI Registers a Case against Accountant Member, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) on the Allegations of Possessing Disproportio...
Income Tax : Law Minister Shri Ravi Shankar Prasad launches 'itat e-dwar', an e-filing portal of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Portal will ena...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that genuineness of transaction, creditworthiness and identity of creditors not proved, hence addition u/s. 68...
Income Tax : ITAT Indore held that rejection of appeal by CIT(A) on the footing of non-payment of advance tax as required by section 249(4)(b) ...
Income Tax : ITAT Indore held that rate of interest on secured loan from banks cannot be compared with the rate of interest on unsecured loan. ...
Income Tax : ITAT Kolkata held that CIT has not applied his mind analytically while assuming jurisdiction for taking cognizance under section 2...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune restored the assessment order as assessee neither filed any evidence nor provided material in an attempt to discharge th...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
Income Tax : Office Order No. 08 of 2021 Post facto approval of the Competent Authority is hereby conveyed for extension of term of ad-hoc appo...
Income Tax : In continuation of the SOP (Standard Operating Procedure) dated 01.06.2020 the hearing of cases at 'ITAT Chandigarh Benches from 0...
Analysis of the ITAT Mumbai ruling in the case of DCIT vs. Red Hat India Pvt. Ltd. regarding revenue recognition and Accounting Standard-9 compliance.
Read about ITAT Delhi’s directive to Assessing Officer to investigate TDS claims and PAN misuse in case of Legend Transport Solutions Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO.
ITAT Mumbai’s ruling on penalty for concealed income based on estimated additions. Analysis of case, legal arguments, and conclusion.
Analysis of ITAT Mumbai’s decision on the deduction allowable for warranty expenses based on actual expenses incurred. Case details and conclusion.
Read about ITAT Mumbai’s decision in BA Continuum India Private Limited Vs. ITO regarding deduction u/s 10A of Income Tax Act before set-off of business loss and depreciation.
ITAT Delhi held that addition under section 68 towards unexplained income unsustainable as AO failed to consider leased land while assessing the agricultural income.
ITAT Mumbai held that damage on account of right to sue is a capital receipt and accordingly not chargeable to tax.
Explore the case of Raj Kumar Karanwal vs. PCIT (ITAT Delhi) and learn why exercise of revisionary jurisdiction by PCIT may not always be valid when issues have been examined by AO. Dive into the details of the case, the assessment process, and implications for taxpayers.
ITAT Mumbai held that the amount of internal transfer between two EOUs of the assessee is to be considered for the purpose of arriving at the profit eligible for exemption under section 10B of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Delhi held that initiation of reassessment proceedings u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act merely on the basis of information from other officer without cogent and demonstrable material unjustified.
