Stay updated with the latest income tax notifications for changes in tax laws, rates, and compliance requirements. Get insights into income tax updates, exemptions, deductions, and important deadlines through income tax notifications.
Income Tax : The ruling clarifies that unauthenticated digital chats and screenshots cannot form the sole basis of tax additions without proper...
Income Tax : Courts held that investment in under-construction property qualifies as construction under Sections 54/54F. Deduction cannot be de...
Income Tax : The new Act reorganises sections, rules, and forms without changing core transfer pricing principles. Taxpayers must adapt to upda...
Income Tax : The new framework eliminates mandatory renewals and replaces them with continuous monitoring. Donor eligibility now depends on sus...
Income Tax : The new law replaces time-bound approvals with continuous compliance monitoring for charitable entities. Registration now survives...
Income Tax : The issue was complexity in the existing tax law. It was clarified that the new Act simplifies structure by reducing sections and ...
Income Tax : The tax department clarified that no search or restriction was carried out against the individual. It termed the allegations basel...
Income Tax : The audit found widespread incorrect claims of deductions for bad debts and reserves. It highlights the need for stricter verifica...
Income Tax : The government replaced the six-decade-old law with the Income-tax Act, 2025. The reform aims to simplify compliance through clear...
Income Tax : A CBI court sentenced seven individuals to four years imprisonment for manipulating tax systems using forged records. The case hig...
Income Tax : The ruling clarifies that unauthenticated digital chats and screenshots cannot form the sole basis of tax additions without proper...
Income Tax : The case involved denial of deduction due to delayed execution of purchase deed. The Tribunal held that investment in an under-con...
Income Tax : Gujarat High Court upheld the deletion of a Section 271D penalty, ruling that the assessment order did not record satisfaction for...
Income Tax : Supreme Court reviews the Kakadia Builders case, addressing Settlement Commission's authority to waive interest under Sections 234...
Income Tax : We request the authority concerned to take a practical view of the problems which the assessees are facing as on date on account o...
Income Tax : The consolidation into Form 121 introduces stricter documentation and reporting obligations. The decision emphasizes accountabilit...
Income Tax : A corrigendum fixes multiple drafting and referencing mistakes in income tax rules. The update ensures clarity without altering su...
Income Tax : CBDT clarified the presentation of error categories in Form U. The update ensures clearer reporting of incorrect income heads and ...
Income Tax : The corrigendum corrects technical errors in multiple ITR schedules, including CG and CYLA. It ensures accurate reporting and smoo...
Income Tax : CBDT corrected multiple clerical and structural errors across income tax return schedules. The changes ensure accurate reporting a...
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 126 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby deletes Serial Nos. 2, 73, 74 and 80 and the entries thereagainst from the Schedule annexed to its notification S.R.O. 1214 (No. 44-Income-tax) dated the 1st July, 1952
Darjeeling District of West Bengal, excluding Siliguri Sub-Division. 2. Kangra District, Punjab. 3. Mandi District, Himachal Pradesh. 4. Trivandrum District, Kerala. 5. Quilon District, Kerala. 6. Kottayam District of Kerala, excluding Meenachhil, Kanjirapally and Changanacherry Talukas. 7. Ernakulam District, Kerala. 8. Trichur District, Kerala. 9
Notification: S.O.1417 Association of Surgeons of India, Madras has been approved by the Indian Council of Medical Research, the prescribed authority, for the purposes of clause (ii) of sub-section (1) of section 35 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961).
Explore CBDT Letter F. No. 12/19/64-IT(B) dated 22-2-1966, clarifying HRA exemption for Central Govt employees receiving flat-rate allowances. Learn about tax implications and pending amendments.
Notification: S.O.189 This notification contains amendments to Income-tax Rules carried out on 13th January, 1966 not reproduced here as it is already contained in the body of the rules itself
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (6) of section 88 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government hereby notifies Sri Nataraja Temple, Chidambaram, Madras State, to be of historic, archaeological and artistic importance for the purpose of the said section
It has been represented to the Board that in view of the difficulties faced by persons migrating from Burma to India, it may not be possible for a migrant from that country to lead the evidence necessary to prove his claim that a particular sum of money has been brought over by him from that country. 2. The Board consider that the case of bona fide migrants from Burma should be dealt with in a sympathetic manner. In their cases production of direct or documentary evidence in the shape of transfer through banks, hundies, etc., in support of remittance from Burma need not be insisted upon. However, with a view to ensure that unscrupulous persons do not abuse the concessions, the ITOs should ensure the satisfaction of the following conditions before accepting a claim of remittance from
On a representation made by the Gujarat Chamber of Commerce, the matter has been reconsidered by the Board in consultation with the Ministry of Law. Under section 271(1)(i) the penalty is to be 2 per cent of the tax, if any, payable by the assessee
On a representation made by the Gujarat Chamber of Commerce, the matter has been reconsidered by the Board in consultation with the Ministry of Law. Under s. 271(l)(a) of the IT Act, 1961, the penalty is to be 2 per cent of the tax, if any, payable by the assessee.
The decision of the Supreme Court was that where the sale was of the concern as a whole and a slump price was paid, no portion of this price was attributable to the stock-in-trade and, therefore, it was not possible to hold that there was a profit other than what resulted from the appreciation of capital. It follows, therefore, that where a business is sold as a going concern, the excess may not be a business profit, but will be capital gain chargeable to tax
