Income Tax : Analysis of Sections 87A and 115BAC(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, detailing their implications for taxpayers, including rebates...
Income Tax : F&O traders need to know how their profits are taxed. With the ITR return filing date approaching, it is imperative to know how st...
Income Tax : Get answers to common ITR issues and FAQs for filing your tax return for AY 2024-25. Resolve filing errors and understand tax regi...
Income Tax : How to calculate the turnover of Futures & Options (F&O) for taxation purposes, including detailed examples and tax filing require...
CA, CS, CMA : Stay informed with February 2024 legal obligations & updates in India. From Income Tax to GST, understand forms, filing dates, & s...
Income Tax : Discover comprehensive FAQs on filing ITR-4 (Sugam) for AY 2024-25. Learn eligibility criteria, tax regime options, documents need...
Income Tax : Learn who can file ITR-1, who cannot, necessary documents, and precautions. Understand the process of filing ITR-1 (Sahaj) online ...
Income Tax : Understand tax deduction rules for dividends as per Income-tax Act, 1961 amendments. Detailed guide on TDS rates, exemptions, and ...
Income Tax : Read the inaugural address from Ravi Agrawal, the new Chairman of CBDT, outlining his vision for enhancing tax administration in I...
CA, CS, CMA : Discover comprehensive proposals from The Punjab Accountants Association to improve tax compliance, extend filing deadlines, inclu...
Income Tax : In the case of Anil Champalal Jain vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai), learn why Mumbai ITAT ruled that cash deposits during demonetization alon...
Income Tax : Read the detailed judgment of Bombay High Court in ACIT Vs Sociedade de Fomento Industrial Pvt Ltd regarding TDS deduction on retr...
Income Tax : ITAT Jaipur quashes PCIT order in Yesh Dagas case, citing violation of natural justice principles. Key points of the judgment and ...
Income Tax : Gujarat High Court quashes Income Tax reassessment notice against Deepak Natvarlal Pankhiyani HUF, citing lack of fresh evidence s...
Income Tax : PCIT Vs Farmson Pharmaceuticals Gujarat Pvt Ltd (Gujarat High Court): Reassessment cannot be solely based on a reevaluation of exi...
Income Tax : CBDT directs DGIT (Systems) to share income tax information with Telangana's Agriculture Department as per Section 138(1)(a) of th...
Income Tax : Discover the latest Income Tax Act notification under section 138 for Telangana by the Ministry of Finance. Details on the designa...
Income Tax : Explore the latest amendment in the Income Tax Act 1961 by Notification No. 50/2024 issued by the Ministry of Finance. Detailed an...
Income Tax : RBI exempted from Section 206AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, via Ministry of Finance notification dated May 27, 2024. Learn more a...
Income Tax : Get insights on Circular No. 7/2024 issued by CBDT, extending due dates for filing Form No. 10A/10AB under the Income-tax Act, 196...
Bombay High Court held that AO and the Tribunal have allowed part of the commission payment as business expenditure. However, disallowance of part of commission payment as business expenditure unjustified.
ITAT Delhi held that entire addition towards unexplained investment under section 69 of the Income Tax Act merely on the basis of presumption is unsustainable in law.
Demystify Taxation for Non-Residents in India with our comprehensive guide. Explore the criteria for determining residential status, obligations, and key tax implications. Don’t navigate the complexities alone – stay informed and compliant.
ITAT Raipur held that revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income Tax Act rightly invoked as there is a gross failure on the part of the A.O to verify the nature and source of the cash deposits.
ITAT Rajkot held that invocation of revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 non-invocation of section 115BBE of the Act on the addition made on account of unexplained sundry creditors u/s. 68 of the Act is duly justifiable.
ITAT Mumbai held that assessee claimed benefit u/s 54 on a different document, whereas ultimately the transaction completed on altogether a different set of conditions and property, which is not permissible to claim benefit u/s. 54 of the Act. Accordingly, benefit u/s. 54 denied.
ITAT Bangalore held that in case of non-resident, income arising in India by way of royalties or technical charges could be taxed in India but that could be only on the receipt basis under India-Switzerland DTAA and not on accrual basis.
ITAT Mumbai held that in terms of General Clauses Act, 1897 period of six month mentioned in Section 54EC of the Income Tax Act has to be regarded as six British Calendar months.
Held that payment of interest on cash loan falls within the ambit of unexplained expenditure within the meaning of Section 69C of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that reopening of assessment u/s. 147 of the Income Tax Act after four years without any tangible material amounts to change of opinion and according the same is invalid and liable to be quashed.
