Corporate Law : The framework permits liquidation only where the company has not defaulted on debts and can pay liabilities. It ensures a clean an...
CA, CS, CMA : The High Court ruled that retrospective cancellation of GST registration is invalid if such action is not proposed in the original...
Corporate Law : Explains how the 2025 amendment removes going-concern sales from liquidation. Highlights the shift toward speed and finality over ...
Corporate Law : IBBI Regulations 32 & 32A for liquidation: defines asset sale modes and prioritizes selling the business as a going concern to max...
Corporate Law : Understand secured creditor rights under IBC Section 52 during liquidation: relinquish security to the estate or realize independe...
Corporate Law : The amendments replace the consultation committee with CoC oversight, giving creditors greater control over liquidation decisions....
Corporate Law : The proposal focuses on enabling creditors to initiate resolution while retaining debtor management under supervision. It sets out...
Corporate Law : The amendments arise from the inclusion of a unified “service provider” definition under the Code. The move expands regulatory...
Corporate Law : The issue addressed is ambiguity in authentication and evidentiary value of financial information in insolvency cases. The propose...
Corporate Law : The proposal aligns grievance regulations with the newly introduced definition under the amended Code. It aims to ensure uniform a...
Company Law : NCLAT Delhi held that each and every commercial transaction which has resulted in loss may not be labelled as fraudulent or to hav...
Company Law : The appellate tribunal quashed orders permitting bankruptcy against personal guarantors after a creditor consented to grant additi...
Company Law : NCLT Allahabad held that financial creditor duly established existence of financial debt and default thereon on the part of the Co...
Company Law : The tribunal held that the resolution plan was invalid because several valuable properties were omitted from the Information Memor...
Company Law : NCLAT Delhi held that Prospective Resolution Applicant or unsuccessful Resolution Applicant doesn’t have vested right to challen...
Corporate Law : The issue was whether IBBI must provide data held by a regulated entity. The Authority held that RTI applies only to information h...
Corporate Law : The appeal found that the RTI response was delayed beyond statutory timelines. The key takeaway is that delay breaches RTI provisi...
Corporate Law : The issue was whether an RVO could grant conditional enrolment to an unqualified applicant. The authority held that such enrolment...
Corporate Law : The amendment allows financial creditors to directly initiate insolvency with prior approvals, reducing delays. It ensures faster ...
Corporate Law : The study found that most MSME insolvency cases are resolved before admission, highlighting gaps in data and process efficiency. I...
The appellate authority held that RTI cannot be used to seek confirmations or opinions. Information already available in the public domain need not be recompiled by the regulator.
The appellate authority held that information could not be disclosed since the subsidiary company was not admitted to insolvency proceedings. RTI access was limited to information held by the regulator.
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India issued a circular introducing electronic forms to monitor insolvency resolution processes for personal guarantors. The move replaces email reporting to improve efficiency, transparency, and structured record-keeping.
The regulator cancelled registration after the valuer ceased to be a member of a Registered Valuers Organisation. The key takeaway is that RVO membership is a continuing and non-negotiable condition for practice.
NCLAT Delhi held that each and every commercial transaction which has resulted in loss may not be labelled as fraudulent or to have been done to deceive creditors. Accordingly, since ingredients of section 66(2) of IBC is lacking, the transaction cannot be labelled as fraudulent.
The appellate tribunal quashed orders permitting bankruptcy against personal guarantors after a creditor consented to grant additional time to submit repayment plans under the insolvency framework.
The authority noted refusal to respond to the show cause notice and unwillingness to continue practice. Cancellation followed due to failure to meet eligibility conditions.
The dispute focused on the statutory requirement of active RVO membership for registered valuers. The Authority reaffirmed that non-compliance with RVO bye-laws and expulsion result in immediate loss of registration rights.
Explains how the 2025 amendment removes going-concern sales from liquidation. Highlights the shift toward speed and finality over revival.
IBBI held that continuous membership of a Registered Valuers Organisation is mandatory. Once expelled by the RVO, a valuer becomes ineligible to continue registration.
