CA, CS, CMA : Explore the major notifications, circulars, and judicial developments issued during 22–28 June 2026, covering Income Tax, GST, R...
CA, CS, CMA : This weekly roundup covers key notifications, circulars, and judicial rulings issued by GST, Customs, RBI, SEBI, MCA, IBBI, and ot...
CA, CS, CMA : A comprehensive review of significant developments across Income Tax, GST, Customs, DGFT, SEBI, MCA, IBBI, and RBI. The update hig...
CA, CS, CMA : The weekly roundup covers important Supreme Court rulings, GST advisories, RBI amendments, SEBI consultation papers, and insolvenc...
CA, CS, CMA : The article summarizes important notifications, circulars, judicial rulings, and regulatory changes issued between 11–17 May 202...
Corporate Law : IBBI has proposed amendments to CIRP, Liquidation, and Personal Guarantor Regulations to improve valuation, clarify RP duties, sim...
Corporate Law : The proposed amendments require comprehensive project-wise disclosures, technical assessments, and mandatory information in resolu...
Corporate Law : The IBBI has announced contractual vacancies for Research Associates and Consultants in law and business management disciplines. T...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : 2026 Guidelines streamline selection of Insolvency Professionals for IRP, RP, Liquidator, and Bankruptcy Trustee roles, ensuring t...
Corporate Law : The NCLT held that a DRT Recovery Certificate provides a fresh cause of action, making the Section 7 application filed within thre...
Corporate Law : The NCLT admitted a Section 7 insolvency application after finding that the Corporate Debtor had acknowledged its liability under ...
Corporate Law : Finvin Investor Private Limited Vs Orix Leasing and Financial Services Limited (NCLAT Delhi) The National Company Law Appellate Tr...
Corporate Law : The Court noted that the complaint against the Resolution Professional and the related proceedings stemmed from CIRP proceedings b...
Corporate Law : The NCLT Kolkata admitted a Section 7 IBC petition after holding that the bank successfully established existence of financial deb...
Corporate Law : The IBBI First Appellate Authority held that although the CPIO failed to respond within the statutory 30-day period under the RTI ...
Corporate Law : IBBI cancelled an IP’s registration over systemic CIRP misuse, flawed valuations, non-disclosures, compliance failures and lack ...
Corporate Law : IBBI has released the Phase 10 syllabus for the Limited Insolvency Examination, effective from October 1, 2026, to reflect evolvin...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority directed the CPIO to dispose of the RTI application after finding it was not decided within the 30-d...
Corporate Law : The First Appellate Authority held that the RTI application remained undisposed beyond the statutory period and directed the CPIO ...
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 has been emerged as a dynamic law and has made tremendous changes in insolvency proceedings. The code has various terminologies which has specific meaning although the definitions are mentioned in the Code but like all other legislations there is a need of interpretation. Therefore the Tribunal/Court from time to time has been given its interpretation through various jugdements. Few terms like financial creditor, dispute and other procedural expressions can be understood with the help of below mentioned judgements.
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 introduced on 28 May, 2016, was brought in to consolidate and amend the laws relating to insolvency and bankruptcy. Within the framework envisaged in the Code, there were plethora of cases admitted for corporate insolvency resolution, including 12 large stressed companies such as Essar Steels Limited, Bhushan Steels Limited, Amtek Auto Limited, etc.
Wherever the approval of resolution plan under regulation 39 (3) of the Regulations is at least 15 days away, the resolution professional shall expeditiously obtain, by electronic means, the choice of the insolvency professional from creditors in a class to act as the authorised representative of the class and proceed further in the manner as specified in regulation 16A of the Regulations.
Wherever the approval of resolution plan under regulation 39 (3) of the Regulations is at least 15 days away, the resolution professional shall expeditiously obtain, by electronic means, the choice of the insolvency professional from creditors in a class to act as the authorised representative of the class and proceed further in the manner as specified in regulation 16A of the Regulations.
An Insolvency Professional Entity (IPE) is recognised in accordance with regulation 12 (1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Professionals) Regulations, 2016, only if its sole objective is to provide support services to the insolvency professionals, who are its partners or directors; as the case may be.
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) has notified the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) (Third Amendment) Regulations, 2018 today.
These regulations may be called the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) (Third Amendment) Regulations, 2018.
IBBI releases Discussion Paper on Discharge from Responsibility as Interim Resolution Professional, Resolution Professional or Liquidator of the Corporate Processes under the Code for comments
Pendency of serious criminal proceeding, as noted above, against the applicant adversely impacts his reputation and makes him not a person fit and proper for registration as an IP. In exercise of the powers conferred on the Board under regulation 8(3)(b) of the Regulations, I, therefore, reject the application for registration as an Insolvency Professional.
When a corporate debtor undergoes corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP), an Insolvency Professional (IP) is vested with the management of its affairs and he manages its operations as a going concern. He complies with the applicable laws on behalf of the corporate debtor. He conducts the entire CIRP.
