Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Income Tax : Explore February 2025's key income tax rulings covering issues like R&D deductions, secondment taxability, trust exemptions, and d...
Goods and Services Tax : February 2025 GST Case Law Compendium covers significant High Court and Supreme Court judgments on key GST issues. Orders issued u...
Corporate Law : Explore key landmark civil cases in India, including their legal impact on constitutional rights, reservations, governance, and wo...
Corporate Law : Kerala High Court quashes order restricting a woman's liberty, stating participation in protests is not sufficient reason to curta...
Income Tax : Delhi HC ruled WGF Financial Services can't claim bad debt deduction under Sec. 36(1)(vii) as furnishing guarantees wasn't its reg...
Corporate Law : Key IBC case law updates from Oct-Dec 2024, covering Supreme Court and High Court decisions on CoC powers, resolution plans, relat...
Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...
Goods and Services Tax : HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA: Ramesh Kumar Patodia v. Citi Bank [WPO NO. 547 OF 2019 JUNE 24, 2022 ] Facts: ♦ Petitioner is a holder ...
Goods and Services Tax : CGST, Gurugram (Anti Evasion) Vs Gaurav Dhir (Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Courts, Gurugram) U/s 132(1)) r/w 132(1)(b)(C)(e...
Corporate Law : In order to dispense with the physical signatures on the daily orders (which are not important/final orders and judgments) of the ...
Goods and Services Tax : Calcutta High Court allows rectification of ITC claims under amended Section 16(5) of WSBGST/CGST Act, citing new cut-off dates fo...
Goods and Services Tax : Jharkhand High Court directs tax authorities to refund excess tax retained after assessment reduction, ruling it violates Articles...
Service Tax : Delhi High Court holds that lack of proof of notice service cannot justify disqualification under Sabka Vishwas Scheme, directing ...
Goods and Services Tax : Calcutta High Court sets aside GST appeal dismissal due to delay, citing procedural lapses and judicial precedents. Read key case ...
Goods and Services Tax : Orissa High Court sets aside a GST adjudication order, citing non-consideration of the assessee’s reply. The case is remanded fo...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court has exempted the Lawyers from wearing Gowns practicing in the High Court with effect from March 2, 2022 till furt...
Madras High Court held that issuance of communication to pay penalty amount within prescribed period, despite of interim orders of division bench directing customs department not to take coercive steps, is untenable in law.
Vodafone Idea Limited vs. Union of India case: Karnataka High Court remands matter to assessing officer for considering C Forms, affected by COVID-19.
Delhi High Court held that notice of proceeding under Section 110(1B) of the Customs Act was required to be issued to the owner or the persons from whom the goods were seized.
Jharkhand High Court held that it is mandatory to record reasons for initiation of proceedings under Section 35(7) of the Jharkhand Value Added Tax Act (JVAT Act). Non-recording of the same makes the proceedings untenable in law.
Madras High Court held that non-submission of certified copy of order within a period of 7 days as stipulated under Rule 108(3) of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (TNGST Act) is only a technical defect.
Bombay High Court held that identify the nature of the goods as to whether they are finished or semi finished based on the entries in the RG-1 register needs reconsideration by the Appellate Tribunal.
Madras High Court held that without instructions, without verifying the records, the petitioner cannot direct his representatives to appear. Accordingly, such representation is untenable in law.
Revenue department cannot continue attachment of bank accounts for several years under Section 83 of the CGST Act for Delay in issuing SCN
Bombay High Court held that Selective investigation of Economic Offence Wing (EOW) betrays the faith of victims. Accordingly, responsible persons for the wrongdoings should not be allowed to escape the process of law.
Orissa High Court held that it is made clear that as conditions of the tender is not satisfied, the decision making process in selecting the party, being arbitrary, unreasonable and contrary to the provision of law, cannot be sustained in the eye of law.
