Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Goods and Services Tax

Excess VAT Retention Violates Articles 14 & 265: Jharkhand HC Directs Refund

Case Law Details

Case Name
Castrol India Limited Vs State of Jharkhand (Jharkhand High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2013-14
Advertisement Castrol India Limited Vs State of Jharkhand (Jharkhand High Court) Jharkhand High Court ruled that the tax department’s failure to refund excess tax deposits after a reassessment violates Articles 14 and 265 of the Constitution. The case involved Castrol India Ltd., which had deposited Rs. 24,00,000 for AY 2014-15 and Rs. 26,00,000 for AY 2013-14 as a condition for obtaining a stay on tax demands. Following a remand by the appellate authority, the final tax liability was significantly reduced, but the excess amount was not refunded despite multiple requests. The company file...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 18,672

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *