Income Tax : The faceless tax assessment scheme in India faces legal disputes over jurisdiction between JAO and FAO. Learn about key court ruli...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore Income Tax systems, from Form 26AS and AIS for tax data to CPC-ITR and faceless assessments ensuring transparency and effi...
Income Tax : Proposed amendment removes the deadline for notifying faceless schemes under the Income-tax Act, allowing notifications beyond Mar...
Income Tax : Taxpayer injustice due to high-pitched assessments and misuse of Section 115BBE of the Income Tax Act in 2017-18 and 2018-19 asses...
Income Tax : Explore faceless assessment, reassessment, and recomputation under the Income Tax Act, as per Finance Act 2021, and related judici...
Income Tax : CBI registers case against 9, including Deputy Commissioner, 2 Inspectors, and 5 CAs, for sabotaging Faceless Tax Scheme; searches...
Income Tax : Learn to handle faceless income tax assessments using AI tools like ChatGPT in a 2-hour live course on Sept 15, 2024. Enhance effi...
Income Tax : Income Tax Faceless Appeals before CIT (A). How to deal with this appeal in new Faceless Regime. Get the Answer of many Questions ...
Income Tax : Explore the impact of faceless tax assessment, benefits, and government's steps to address taxpayer grievances. Get insights into ...
Income Tax : KARNATAKA STATE CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS ASSOCIATION (R) Date: Saturday, September 24, 2022 To, Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman Hon. Union Mi...
Income Tax : Punjab & Haryana High Court quashes notice u/s 148 issued by jurisdictional AO, ruling that only NFAC has authority post CBDT Circ...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC sets aside faceless assessment order due to lack of personal hearing via video conference, directing a fresh order in c...
Corporate Law : Madras High Court dismisses writ petitions challenging JAO's jurisdiction in issuing Section 148 notices under IT Act, citing comp...
Income Tax : Punjab & Haryana HC invalidates Section 148 notice due to non-compliance with faceless assessment provisions under Section 144B of...
Income Tax : Punjab & Haryana High Court sets aside notice under Section 148 in Mohan Jit Singh case, following prior judgments in similar case...
Custom Duty : F. No.450/26/2019-Cus. IV(Pt) Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue (Central Board of Indirect Taxes &...
Custom Duty : OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (NS – I), JAWAHAR LAL NEHRU CUSTOM HOUSE, NHAVA-SHEVA,TAL-URAN, (e-mail:appraisingmain...
Income Tax : In pursuance of sub-section (3) of section 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the fo...
Income Tax : In pursuance of para 4 of S.O. 5429(E) Notification No. 139/2021/F.No.370142/66/2021- TPL, dated the 28th December, 2021, notifyin...
Income Tax : CBDT notifies jurisdiction of CIT(A) under Faceless Appeal Scheme, 2021 vide Notification No. 113/2022-Income Tax Dated: 13th...
Whether Central Processing Centre (CPC) Bangalore processes the Income Tax returns without applying the provisions of Section 5A in several cases resulting in hardships and harassments to the tax payers of Goa;
In the following paragraphs, I have discussed some of the recent developments in direct tax laws. The discussion is kept simple enough, so that a layman can also understand the very technical topic of income tax. Recent Developments in Income Tax Faceless Assessments and appeals The government launched the faceless scheme on the 13th of […]
In view of Indiscriminate notices by income Tax Department without allowing reasonable time it is requested to Finance Ministry and CBDT that suitable steps should be taken so that adequate time is allowed for compliance and cases are not disposed of in a hurry, without giving adequate opportunity for the taxpayer to be heard. The […]
Lucknow CA Tax Practicioners Association has made a Representation to FM for Extension of Time Limit for Assessment cases time barring as on 31.3.22 under the Income Tax Act 1961 in view of Problems faced in completion of Reopened Assessment cases (letting time barred on 31st March 2022, Problems faced in completion of Assessment as […]
High Court held that use of the expression ‘may’ in Section 144B(7)(viii) is not decisive. Where a discretion is conferred upon a quasi judicial authority whose decision has civil consequences, the word ‘may’ which denotes discretion should be construed to mean a command. Consequently, the requirement of giving an assessee a reasonable opportunity of personal hearing is mandatory.
CBDT notifies vide Order No. F. No. 187/3/2020-ITA-I | Dated: 17th March, 2022 the Assessments which shall he completed by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer (AO) i.e. Assessment orders in all cases for which the time for completion expires on 31.03.2022 pending with the jurisdictional Assessing Officer as on 15.03.2022 or thereafter, which cannot he completed […]
Cases for which the time limit for completion expires on 31.03.2022 pending with the jurisdictional Assessing Officer as on 15.03.2022 or thereafter, which cannot be completed as per the procedure laid down under Section 144B of the Act due to technical / procedural constraints in the given period of limitation
Income Tax Gazetted Officers Association has made a request to Honourable Finance Minister for extension of the Time Barring Date for certain proceedings exercising the power vested in the GOI Income Tax Gazetted Officers Association President ARAVIND TRIVEDI (7599101090) trivediaravind@yahoo.co.in Secretary General BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA (8902198888) secgenitgoachq@gmail.com Date: 10.03.2022. To The Honourable Finance Minister, Government of […]
Omkar Nath Vs National Faceless Assessment Centre Delhi (Delhi High Court) Concededly, the AO passed the impugned assessment order, as indicated above, on 07.06.2021, without granting an opportunity to the petitioner of a personal hearing in the matter. This being the position, clearly, the provisions of Section 144B(7)(vii) of the Act would apply in this […]
By his/her conduct, the Assessing Officer has compelled petitioner to knock at the doors of this Court and thereby has also impinged on the valuable judicial time of this Court. In our view, this is a fit case where this Assessing Officer should be saddled with substantial cost to drive home a message that this kind of attitude will not be tolerated ever.
