Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : RGPL Commodities Pvt Ltd faces penalties under Section 89(6) of the Companies Act, 2013 for delayed filing of e-Form MGT-6. Total ...
Company Law : GM Elektra Pvt Ltd fined ₹1,88,500 by ROC Mumbai for delayed filing of BEN-2 under Section 90 of the Companies Act, 2013. Direct...
Company Law : Registrar of Companies penalizes Paramount Dye Tec Limited for not disclosing trading activity in its MOA, violating Section 4(1)(...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Singodwala Warehousing for non-compliance with Section 62(3) of Companies Act. Fine details and appeal process ...
Company Law : MBL Infrastructure Ltd. faces scrutiny under Section 90 of the Companies Act for non-compliance. Details on adjudicating officer's...
As per the provisions of Section 10A(1), a newly incorporated company with share capital must file a declaration within 180 days of incorporation, confirming that every subscriber to the memorandum has paid the value of the shares agreed upon. The company also needs to verify its registered office details. However, Vena Energy Aura Private Limited failed to fulfill these requirements.
Company failed to appoint a Whole Time Company Secretary within the required timeframe of six months, as per the provisions of Section 203(1) of the Act. The company eventually appointed a Whole Time Company Secretary with a delay of 140 days. This delay resulted in a violation of Section 203(1) and rendered the company and its officers liable under Section 203(5).
Company failed to attach a complete copy of the Director’s Report and Auditor’s Report for financial year 2019-20, resulting in violation of Section 134 & 137 of Companies Act.
Violation of Section 135(6) of Companies Act, 2013 by M/S. Kony India Private Limited as company failed to transfer an unspent amount of Rs. 42,09,263/- to the Unspent Corporate Social Responsibility Account within the specified time frame. The company has since transferred the amount, but a penalty has been imposed. The penalty for the company […]
Read about the penalties imposed on Nature Gold Nidhi Limited for non-compliance with the Companies Act, 2013. Learn about the violations, fines, and the appeal process
MCA Imposes Penalty of Rs. 14,00,000 for non-submission of Balance Sheet in Uttar Pradesh. Learn about the case & the subsequent penalties in this post.
Discover the outcome of an appeal under section 454(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 for default in appointing a Company Secretary, where the penalty was reduced to Rs. 1.25 Lakh.
Section 152(3) of Companies Act, 2013, mandate that an individual cannot be appointed as director unless allocated a DIN as per Section 154
MCA imposes penalties on RSUN Pharma Pvt Ltd & directors for violating Section 12(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. Details & implications.
Explore the adjudication order concerning Avanti Leathers Limited under the Companies Act, 2013, addressing penalties for non-compliance with section 203.
